On 25.06.2024 02:14, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> I do realize that some of the notifier pattern switches might want to
> handle all parameters but Bugseng or anyone else looking for simple
> improvements are not in the position to tell which ones they are. We
> need to wait for a maintainer or expe
On Sat, 22 Jun 2024, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 21/06/2024 23:34, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > > > Yes, I also think this could be an opportunity to check the pattern
> > > > > but no one has yet been identified to do this.
> > > >
> > > > I don't think I understand Julien's question and/or your
Hi Stefano,
On 21/06/2024 23:34, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Yes, I also think this could be an opportunity to check the pattern
but no one has yet been identified to do this.
I don't think I understand Julien's question and/or your answer.
Is the question whether someone has done an analysis t
On Fri, 21 Jun 2024, Federico Serafini wrote:
> On 21/06/24 03:13, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Jun 2024, Federico Serafini wrote:
> > > On 19/06/24 13:17, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > > Hi Federico,
> > > >
> > > > On 19/06/2024 10:29, Federico Serafini wrote:
> > > > > MISRA C Rule 16.4
On 21/06/24 03:13, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024, Federico Serafini wrote:
On 19/06/24 13:17, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Federico,
On 19/06/2024 10:29, Federico Serafini wrote:
MISRA C Rule 16.4 states that every `switch' statement shall have a
`default' label" and a statement or
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024, Federico Serafini wrote:
> On 19/06/24 13:17, Julien Grall wrote:
> > Hi Federico,
> >
> > On 19/06/2024 10:29, Federico Serafini wrote:
> > > MISRA C Rule 16.4 states that every `switch' statement shall have a
> > > `default' label" and a statement or a comment prior to the
>
On 19/06/24 13:17, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Federico,
On 19/06/2024 10:29, Federico Serafini wrote:
MISRA C Rule 16.4 states that every `switch' statement shall have a
`default' label" and a statement or a comment prior to the
terminating break statement.
This patch addresses some violations of
On 19.06.2024 13:21, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
> On 19/06/2024 12:17, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi Federico,
>>
>> On 19/06/2024 10:29, Federico Serafini wrote:
>>> MISRA C Rule 16.4 states that every `switch' statement shall have a
>>> `default' label" and a statement or a comment prior to the
>>> te
On 19/06/2024 12:17, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Federico,
On 19/06/2024 10:29, Federico Serafini wrote:
MISRA C Rule 16.4 states that every `switch' statement shall have a
`default' label" and a statement or a comment prior to the
terminating break statement.
This patch addresses some violation
Hi Federico,
On 19/06/2024 10:29, Federico Serafini wrote:
MISRA C Rule 16.4 states that every `switch' statement shall have a
`default' label" and a statement or a comment prior to the
terminating break statement.
This patch addresses some violations of the rule related to the
"notifier patter
MISRA C Rule 16.4 states that every `switch' statement shall have a
`default' label" and a statement or a comment prior to the
terminating break statement.
This patch addresses some violations of the rule related to the
"notifier pattern": a frequently-used pattern whereby only a few values
are ha
11 matches
Mail list logo
