Re: [XEN PATCH v10 3/5] x86/pvh: Add PHYSDEVOP_setup_gsi for PVH dom0

2024-06-19 Thread Chen, Jiqian
On 2024/6/19 17:49, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 19.06.2024 10:51, Chen, Jiqian wrote: >> On 2024/6/19 16:06, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 19.06.2024 09:53, Chen, Jiqian wrote: On 2024/6/18 16:55, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 18.06.2024 08:57, Chen, Jiqian wrote: >> On 2024/6/17 22:52, Jan Beulich

Re: [XEN PATCH v10 3/5] x86/pvh: Add PHYSDEVOP_setup_gsi for PVH dom0

2024-06-19 Thread Jan Beulich
On 19.06.2024 10:51, Chen, Jiqian wrote: > On 2024/6/19 16:06, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 19.06.2024 09:53, Chen, Jiqian wrote: >>> On 2024/6/18 16:55, Jan Beulich wrote: On 18.06.2024 08:57, Chen, Jiqian wrote: > On 2024/6/17 22:52, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 17.06.2024 11:00, Jiqian Chen

Re: [XEN PATCH v10 3/5] x86/pvh: Add PHYSDEVOP_setup_gsi for PVH dom0

2024-06-19 Thread Chen, Jiqian
On 2024/6/19 16:06, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 19.06.2024 09:53, Chen, Jiqian wrote: >> On 2024/6/18 16:55, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 18.06.2024 08:57, Chen, Jiqian wrote: On 2024/6/17 22:52, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 17.06.2024 11:00, Jiqian Chen wrote: >> The gsi of a passthrough device m

Re: [XEN PATCH v10 3/5] x86/pvh: Add PHYSDEVOP_setup_gsi for PVH dom0

2024-06-19 Thread Jan Beulich
On 19.06.2024 09:53, Chen, Jiqian wrote: > On 2024/6/18 16:55, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 18.06.2024 08:57, Chen, Jiqian wrote: >>> On 2024/6/17 22:52, Jan Beulich wrote: On 17.06.2024 11:00, Jiqian Chen wrote: > The gsi of a passthrough device must be configured for it to be > able to b

Re: [XEN PATCH v10 3/5] x86/pvh: Add PHYSDEVOP_setup_gsi for PVH dom0

2024-06-19 Thread Chen, Jiqian
On 2024/6/18 16:55, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 18.06.2024 08:57, Chen, Jiqian wrote: >> On 2024/6/17 22:52, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 17.06.2024 11:00, Jiqian Chen wrote: The gsi of a passthrough device must be configured for it to be able to be mapped into a hvm domU. But When dom0 is

Re: [XEN PATCH v10 3/5] x86/pvh: Add PHYSDEVOP_setup_gsi for PVH dom0

2024-06-18 Thread Jan Beulich
On 18.06.2024 08:57, Chen, Jiqian wrote: > On 2024/6/17 22:52, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 17.06.2024 11:00, Jiqian Chen wrote: >>> The gsi of a passthrough device must be configured for it to be >>> able to be mapped into a hvm domU. >>> But When dom0 is PVH, the gsis don't get registered, it causes

Re: [XEN PATCH v10 3/5] x86/pvh: Add PHYSDEVOP_setup_gsi for PVH dom0

2024-06-17 Thread Chen, Jiqian
On 2024/6/17 22:52, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 17.06.2024 11:00, Jiqian Chen wrote: >> The gsi of a passthrough device must be configured for it to be >> able to be mapped into a hvm domU. >> But When dom0 is PVH, the gsis don't get registered, it causes >> the info of apic, pin and irq not be added i

Re: [XEN PATCH v10 3/5] x86/pvh: Add PHYSDEVOP_setup_gsi for PVH dom0

2024-06-17 Thread Jan Beulich
On 17.06.2024 11:00, Jiqian Chen wrote: > The gsi of a passthrough device must be configured for it to be > able to be mapped into a hvm domU. > But When dom0 is PVH, the gsis don't get registered, it causes > the info of apic, pin and irq not be added into irq_2_pin list, > and the handler of irq_

[XEN PATCH v10 3/5] x86/pvh: Add PHYSDEVOP_setup_gsi for PVH dom0

2024-06-17 Thread Jiqian Chen
The gsi of a passthrough device must be configured for it to be able to be mapped into a hvm domU. But When dom0 is PVH, the gsis don't get registered, it causes the info of apic, pin and irq not be added into irq_2_pin list, and the handler of irq_desc is not set, then when passthrough a device, s