On 2024/6/14 14:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 14.06.2024 05:11, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>> On 2024/6/13 20:51, Anthony PERARD wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 10:55:14AM +, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
On 2024/6/12 18:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 12.06.2024 12:12, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>> On 2024/
On 14.06.2024 05:11, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> On 2024/6/13 20:51, Anthony PERARD wrote:
>> On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 10:55:14AM +, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>>> On 2024/6/12 18:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.06.2024 12:12, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> On 2024/6/11 22:39, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 07.06
Hi Daniel,
On 2024/6/11 22:39, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 07.06.2024 10:11, Jiqian Chen wrote:
>> +case XEN_DOMCTL_gsi_permission:
>> +{
>> +unsigned int gsi = domctl->u.gsi_permission.gsi;
>> +int irq = gsi_2_irq(gsi);
>> +bool allow = domctl->u.gsi_permission.allow
On 2024/6/13 20:51, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 10:55:14AM +, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>> On 2024/6/12 18:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 12.06.2024 12:12, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
On 2024/6/11 22:39, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 07.06.2024 10:11, Jiqian Chen wrote:
>> +r =
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 10:55:14AM +, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> On 2024/6/12 18:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 12.06.2024 12:12, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> >> On 2024/6/11 22:39, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 07.06.2024 10:11, Jiqian Chen wrote:
> +r = xc_domain_gsi_permission(ctx->xch, domid, gsi
On 12.06.2024 12:55, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> On 2024/6/12 18:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 12.06.2024 12:12, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>>> On 2024/6/11 22:39, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 07.06.2024 10:11, Jiqian Chen wrote:
> +r = xc_domain_gsi_permission(ctx->xch, domid, gsi, map);
Looking
On 2024/6/12 18:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 12.06.2024 12:12, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
>> On 2024/6/11 22:39, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 07.06.2024 10:11, Jiqian Chen wrote:
Some type of domain don't have PIRQ, like PVH, it do not do
PHYSDEVOP_map_pirq for each gsi. When passthrough a device
>>
On 12.06.2024 12:12, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> On 2024/6/11 22:39, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 07.06.2024 10:11, Jiqian Chen wrote:
>>> Some type of domain don't have PIRQ, like PVH, it do not do
>>> PHYSDEVOP_map_pirq for each gsi. When passthrough a device
>>> to guest on PVH dom0, callstack
>>> pci_add
Hi Jan,
On 2024/6/11 22:39, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 07.06.2024 10:11, Jiqian Chen wrote:
>> Some type of domain don't have PIRQ, like PVH, it do not do
>> PHYSDEVOP_map_pirq for each gsi. When passthrough a device
>> to guest on PVH dom0, callstack
>> pci_add_dm_done->XEN_DOMCTL_irq_permission wil
On 07.06.2024 10:11, Jiqian Chen wrote:
> Some type of domain don't have PIRQ, like PVH, it do not do
> PHYSDEVOP_map_pirq for each gsi. When passthrough a device
> to guest on PVH dom0, callstack
> pci_add_dm_done->XEN_DOMCTL_irq_permission will failed at
> domain_pirq_to_irq, because PVH has no m
Some type of domain don't have PIRQ, like PVH, it do not do
PHYSDEVOP_map_pirq for each gsi. When passthrough a device
to guest on PVH dom0, callstack
pci_add_dm_done->XEN_DOMCTL_irq_permission will failed at
domain_pirq_to_irq, because PVH has no mapping of gsi, pirq
and irq on Xen side.
What's m
11 matches
Mail list logo
