Hi Michal,
> On 2 Apr 2025, at 10:42, Michal Orzel wrote:
>
> There's no benefit in having process_shm_chosen() next to process_shm().
> The former is just a helper to pass "/chosen" node to the latter for
> hwdom case. Drop process_shm_chosen() and instead use process_shm()
> passing NULL as no
There's no benefit in having process_shm_chosen() next to process_shm().
The former is just a helper to pass "/chosen" node to the latter for
hwdom case. Drop process_shm_chosen() and instead use process_shm()
passing NULL as node parameter, which will result in searching for and
using /chosen to f
