Hi Michal,

> On 2 Apr 2025, at 10:42, Michal Orzel <michal.or...@amd.com> wrote:
> 
> There's no benefit in having process_shm_chosen() next to process_shm().
> The former is just a helper to pass "/chosen" node to the latter for
> hwdom case. Drop process_shm_chosen() and instead use process_shm()
> passing NULL as node parameter, which will result in searching for and
> using /chosen to find shm node (the DT full path search is done in
> process_shm() to avoid expensive lookup if !CONFIG_STATIC_SHM). This
> will simplify future handling of hw/control domain separation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michal Orzel <michal.or...@amd.com>

Thanks for the BUG_ON :-)

Reviewed-by: Bertrand Marquis <bertrand.marq...@arm.com>

Cheers
Bertrand

> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - rebase on ACPI fix
> - add BUG_ON for !/chosen
> ---
> xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c             |  2 +-
> xen/arch/arm/include/asm/static-shmem.h | 14 --------------
> xen/arch/arm/static-shmem.c             |  7 +++++++
> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> index 85f423214a44..634333cddef3 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain_build.c
> @@ -2327,7 +2327,7 @@ int __init construct_hwdom(struct kernel_info *kinfo)
> 
>     if ( acpi_disabled )
>     {
> -        rc = process_shm_chosen(d, kinfo);
> +        rc = process_shm(d, kinfo, NULL);
>         if ( rc < 0 )
>             return rc;
>     }
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/static-shmem.h 
> b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/static-shmem.h
> index fd0867c4f26b..94eaa9d500f9 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/static-shmem.h
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/include/asm/static-shmem.h
> @@ -18,14 +18,6 @@ int make_resv_memory_node(const struct kernel_info *kinfo, 
> int addrcells,
> int process_shm(struct domain *d, struct kernel_info *kinfo,
>                 const struct dt_device_node *node);
> 
> -static inline int process_shm_chosen(struct domain *d,
> -                                     struct kernel_info *kinfo)
> -{
> -    const struct dt_device_node *node = dt_find_node_by_path("/chosen");
> -
> -    return process_shm(d, kinfo, node);
> -}
> -
> int process_shm_node(const void *fdt, int node, uint32_t address_cells,
>                      uint32_t size_cells);
> 
> @@ -74,12 +66,6 @@ static inline int process_shm(struct domain *d, struct 
> kernel_info *kinfo,
>     return 0;
> }
> 
> -static inline int process_shm_chosen(struct domain *d,
> -                                     struct kernel_info *kinfo)
> -{
> -    return 0;
> -}
> -
> static inline void init_sharedmem_pages(void) {};
> 
> static inline int remove_shm_from_rangeset(const struct kernel_info *kinfo,
> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/static-shmem.c b/xen/arch/arm/static-shmem.c
> index c74fa13d4847..e8d4ca3ba3ff 100644
> --- a/xen/arch/arm/static-shmem.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/static-shmem.c
> @@ -297,6 +297,13 @@ int __init process_shm(struct domain *d, struct 
> kernel_info *kinfo,
> {
>     struct dt_device_node *shm_node;
> 
> +    /* Hwdom case - shm node under /chosen */
> +    if ( !node )
> +    {
> +        node = dt_find_node_by_path("/chosen");
> +        BUG_ON(!node);
> +    }
> +
>     dt_for_each_child_node(node, shm_node)
>     {
>         const struct membank *boot_shm_bank;
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 


Reply via email to