On Tue, 18 Mar 2025, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 18.03.2025 00:55, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Mon, 17 Mar 2025, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> >> On 2025-03-17 10:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 06.03.2025 23:03, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> --- a/xen/include/xsm/dummy.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xsm/dummy
On 18.03.2025 00:55, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2025, Jason Andryuk wrote:
>> On 2025-03-17 10:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 06.03.2025 23:03, Jason Andryuk wrote:
--- a/xen/include/xsm/dummy.h
+++ b/xen/include/xsm/dummy.h
@@ -95,7 +95,11 @@ static always_inline int
On Mon, 17 Mar 2025, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> On 2025-03-17 10:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 06.03.2025 23:03, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> > > --- a/xen/include/xsm/dummy.h
> > > +++ b/xen/include/xsm/dummy.h
> > > @@ -95,7 +95,11 @@ static always_inline int xsm_default_action(
> > > return
On 2025-03-17 10:22, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.03.2025 23:03, Jason Andryuk wrote:
--- a/xen/include/xsm/dummy.h
+++ b/xen/include/xsm/dummy.h
@@ -95,7 +95,11 @@ static always_inline int xsm_default_action(
return 0;
fallthrough;
case XSM_PRIV:
-if ( is_contr
On 06.03.2025 23:03, Jason Andryuk wrote:
> --- a/xen/include/xsm/dummy.h
> +++ b/xen/include/xsm/dummy.h
> @@ -95,7 +95,11 @@ static always_inline int xsm_default_action(
> return 0;
> fallthrough;
> case XSM_PRIV:
> -if ( is_control_domain(src) )
> +case XSM
Xen includes disctinct concepts of a control domain (privileged) and a
hardware domain, but there is only a single XSM_PRIV check. For dom0
this is not an issue as they are one and the same.
With hyperlaunch and its build capabiliies, a non-privileged hwdom and a
privileged control domain should
