Re: [linux-linus test] 152672: regressions - FAIL

2020-08-22 Thread Jürgen Groß
On 23.08.20 07:24, osstest service owner wrote: flight 152672 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/152672/ Regressions :-( With 32-bit pv support now removed from the kernel the associated tests should be removed for the upstream kernel, too. Juergen Te

[linux-linus test] 152672: regressions - FAIL

2020-08-22 Thread osstest service owner
flight 152672 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/152672/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332 test-amd64-i386-qem

[qemu-mainline test] 152668: regressions - FAIL

2020-08-22 Thread osstest service owner
flight 152668 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/152668/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd 10 redhat-install fail REGR. vs. 152631 test-amd64-amd64-

Re: [patch RFC 38/38] irqchip: Add IMS array driver - NOT FOR MERGING

2020-08-22 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 03:34:45AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >> One question is whether the device can see partial updates to that > >> memory due to the async 'swap' of context from the device CPU. > > > > It is worse than just partial updates.. The device operation is much > > more like you

[xen-unstable test] 152667: tolerable FAIL

2020-08-22 Thread osstest service owner
flight 152667 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/152667/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-i386-xsm 10 debian-hvm-install fail like 152644 test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 1

Re: [PATCH-for-5.2] hw/i386/q35: Remove unreachable Xen code on Q35 machine

2020-08-22 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Hi Anthony, On 8/11/20 12:55 PM, Anthony PERARD wrote: > On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 10:25:17AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> Xen accelerator requires specific changes to a machine to be able >> to use it. See for example the 'Xen PC' machine configure its PCI >> bus calling pc_xen_hvm_in

[linux-5.4 test] 152664: regressions - FAIL

2020-08-22 Thread osstest service owner
flight 152664 linux-5.4 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/152664/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-libvirt-xsm 20 guest-destroyfail REGR. vs. 152614 Tests which did not s

[libvirt test] 152666: regressions - FAIL

2020-08-22 Thread osstest service owner
flight 152666 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/152666/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777 build-i386-libvirt

Re: [patch RFC 00/38] x86, PCI, XEN, genirq ...: Prepare for device MSI

2020-08-22 Thread Jürgen Groß
On 21.08.20 02:24, Thomas Gleixner wrote: First of all, sorry for the horrible long Cc list, which was unfortunately unavoidable as this touches the world and some more. This patch series aims to provide a base to support device MSI (non PCI based) in a halfways architecture independent way. It

[linux-linus test] 152663: regressions - FAIL

2020-08-22 Thread osstest service owner
flight 152663 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/152663/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 152332 test-amd64-i386-qem