[Xen-devel] "make world" clobbers doc/man{1, 5, 7, 8} but doesn't always receate them

2019-04-19 Thread Kevin Buckley
Issuing a "make world" clobbers four directories within the source tree doc/man[1,5,7,8} as part of the "make clean" Those directories don't appear to be re-created during the "make dist" within my recent build. As the toplevel Makefile has make world: $(MAKE) clean $(MAKE) dist I fo

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-smoke test] 135007: regressions - FAIL

2019-04-19 Thread osstest service owner
flight 135007 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/135007/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 133991 Tests

Re: [Xen-devel] tools/Makefile: the qemu-xen-dir-remote directory in qemu-xen-dir-force-update target

2019-04-19 Thread Kevin Buckley
On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 at 14:19, Kevin Buckley wrote: > > I am looking to build a Xen from a downloaded source tree at commit cb70a26 > > In the tools/Makefile, there is this target at Line 204 > > .PHONY: qemu-xen-dir-force-update > qemu-xen-dir-force-update: qemu-xen-dir-find > set -ex; \ >

Re: [Xen-devel] Hypervisor build can't work without `python` (Was: Re: Xen commit 9b0bc91b3 possibly removed too much info from README)

2019-04-19 Thread Kevin Buckley
On Fri, 19 Apr 2019 at 14:07, Kevin Buckley wrote: > > I am actually thinking of installing a Python 2 and making the link to > the bare /usr/bin/python point to that, just to see if I can get things > to build. So I did that and the hypervisor, tools and docs were all built and installed as expe

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.12-testing test] 134929: regressions - FAIL

2019-04-19 Thread osstest service owner
flight 134929 xen-4.12-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/134929/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-arm64 broken in 134568 build-arm64-pvops

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-smoke test] 135001: regressions - FAIL

2019-04-19 Thread osstest service owner
flight 135001 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/135001/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 133991 Tests

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/6] xen: extend XEN_DOMCTL_memory_mapping to handle cacheability

2019-04-19 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Tue, 26 Feb 2019, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi, > > On 26/02/2019 23:07, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > Reuse the existing padding field to pass cacheability information about > > the memory mapping, specifically, whether the memory should be mapped as > > normal memory or as device memory (this is

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 134923: regressions - FAIL

2019-04-19 Thread osstest service owner
flight 134923 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/134923/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-i386-libvirt6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 134763 build-i386-pvops

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/6] xen: extend XEN_DOMCTL_memory_mapping to handle cacheability

2019-04-19 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > On 2/26/19 11:07 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > Reuse the existing padding field to pass cacheability information about > > the memory mapping, specifically, whether the memory should be mapped as > > normal memory or as device memory (

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/6] libxl/xl: add cacheability option to iomem

2019-04-19 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Wed, 27 Feb 2019, Julien Grall wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > On 2/26/19 11:07 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > Parse a new cacheability option for the iomem parameter, it can be > > "devmem" for device memory mappings, which is the default, or "memory" > > for normal memory mappings. > > > > Store

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-smoke test] 134995: regressions - FAIL

2019-04-19 Thread osstest service owner
flight 134995 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/134995/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 133991 Tests

[Xen-devel] [linux-3.18 test] 134917: regressions - FAIL

2019-04-19 Thread osstest service owner
flight 134917 linux-3.18 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/134917/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-arm64-xsm broken in 134634 build-arm64-pvops

Re: [Xen-devel] BACKPORT Re: [PATCH 3/7] Arm/atomic: correct asm() constraints in build_add_sized()

2019-04-19 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Wed, 13 Mar 2019, Julien Grall wrote: > On 13/03/2019 10:21, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > > On 11.03.19 at 19:08, wrote: > > > On 11/03/2019 16:49, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > The memory operand is an in/out one, and the auxiliary register gets > > > > written to early. > > > > > > > > Take the o

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-smoke test] 134992: regressions - FAIL

2019-04-19 Thread osstest service owner
flight 134992 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/134992/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 133991 Tests

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 01/12] xen: clang: Support correctly cross-compile

2019-04-19 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Fri, 29 Mar 2019, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 29.03.19 at 10:41, wrote: > > On 28/03/2019 09:55, Jan Beulich wrote: > > On 27.03.19 at 19:45, wrote: > >>> Clang uses "-target" option for cross-compilation. > >> > >>> --- a/config/StdGNU.mk > >>> +++ b/config/StdGNU.mk > >>> @@ -1,8 +1,13

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-smoke test] 134988: regressions - FAIL

2019-04-19 Thread osstest service owner
flight 134988 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/134988/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 133991 Tests

Re: [Xen-devel] Question regarding swiotlb-xen in Linux kernel

2019-04-19 Thread Dongli Zhang
On 04/19/2019 01:47 PM, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 19/04/2019 00:31, Joe Jin wrote: >> On 4/18/19 2:09 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >>> On 4/18/19 3:36 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: I'm currently investigating a problem related to swiotlb-xen. With a specific driver a customer is capable to tri

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 134899: regressions - FAIL

2019-04-19 Thread osstest service owner
flight 134899 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/134899/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-xsm 23 leak-check/check fail REGR. vs. 133909 test-amd64-amd64-

Re: [Xen-devel] Question regarding swiotlb-xen in Linux kernel

2019-04-19 Thread Joe Jin
On 4/18/19 10:47 PM, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 19/04/2019 00:31, Joe Jin wrote: >> On 4/18/19 2:09 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote: >>> On 4/18/19 3:36 AM, Juergen Gross wrote: I'm currently investigating a problem related to swiotlb-xen. With a specific driver a customer is capable to trigger

[Xen-devel] [freebsd-master test] 134985: all pass - PUSHED

2019-04-19 Thread osstest service owner
flight 134985 freebsd-master real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/134985/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: freebsd 55a254f77345437156ffb61a3e8bc7aa5d93d34a baseline version: freebsd 66dd3f2bd67

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-smoke test] 134986: regressions - FAIL

2019-04-19 Thread osstest service owner
flight 134986 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/134986/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 133991 Tests

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-smoke test] 134983: regressions - FAIL

2019-04-19 Thread osstest service owner
flight 134983 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/134983/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 133991 Tests

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2 v2] x86/acpi: Improve suspend and resume process for Zhaoxin CPU

2019-04-19 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 19/04/2019 09:50, FionaLi-oc wrote: > When executing SYSEXIT or SYSENTRY in Zhaoxin CPU, CPU needs to > save or restore a set of MSRs. > > Signed-off-by: FionaLi-oc Acked-by: Andrew Cooper I've pulled this into x86-next, and it will get committed when CI has been repaired and is working agai

[Xen-devel] [ovmf baseline-only test] 84039: trouble: blocked/broken

2019-04-19 Thread Platform Team regression test user
This run is configured for baseline tests only. flight 84039 ovmf real [real] http://osstest.xensource.com/osstest/logs/84039/ Failures and problems with tests :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-xsm

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2 v2] x86/acpi: Improve suspend and resume process for Zhaoxin CPU

2019-04-19 Thread FionaLi-oc
When executing SYSEXIT or SYSENTRY in Zhaoxin CPU, CPU needs to save or restore a set of MSRs. Signed-off-by: FionaLi-oc --- xen/arch/x86/acpi/suspend.c | 6 -- xen/arch/x86/x86_64/traps.c | 3 ++- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/suspend.c b/x

[Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 134885: regressions - FAIL

2019-04-19 Thread osstest service owner
flight 134885 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/134885/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qcow217 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs. 133580 build-armhf-pvops

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5] x86/altp2m: Aggregate get entry and populate into common funcs

2019-04-19 Thread Alexandru Stefan ISAILA
On 18.04.2019 21:42, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 11:02 AM George Dunlap > wrote: >> >> On 4/18/19 2:59 PM, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: >>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 3:53 AM George Dunlap >>> wrote: On 4/17/19 7:22 PM, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 a

[Xen-devel] [distros-debian-jessie test] 84037: trouble: blocked/broken

2019-04-19 Thread Platform Team regression test user
flight 84037 distros-debian-jessie real [real] http://osstest.xensource.com/osstest/logs/84037/ Failures and problems with tests :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-armhf-pvopsbroken build-i386

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.8-testing test] 134871: regressions - FAIL

2019-04-19 Thread osstest service owner
flight 134871 xen-4.8-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/134871/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-xsm 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 130965 build-i386-prev

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-smoke test] 134980: regressions - FAIL

2019-04-19 Thread osstest service owner
flight 134980 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/134980/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-i386 10 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 133991 Tests

[Xen-devel] [ovmf test] 134977: all pass - PUSHED

2019-04-19 Thread osstest service owner
flight 134977 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/134977/ Perfect :-) All tests in this flight passed as required version targeted for testing: ovmf c2f643479eb3f00d930c461cdec3ba420a36072c baseline version: ovmf 0eccea3fbe2f6d4999d97

[Xen-devel] [linux-4.19 test] 134875: regressions - FAIL

2019-04-19 Thread osstest service owner
flight 134875 linux-4.19 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/134875/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-arm64-pvopsbroken in 134615 build-arm64-xsm