flight 103996 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103996/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf f05c2e9fca28fcfb529e43af985605a362d2aa98
baseline version:
ovmf d9bb3ca3c2a1bd3f7b78a
On 28 December 2016 at 23:19, Julien Grall wrote:
> On 21/12/16 22:12, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 21 Dec 2016, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>
>>> On 20/12/2016 20:53, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 20 Dec 2016, Julien Grall wrote:
>
> On 19/12/2016 21:24, Stefano Stabell
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 68286 ovmf real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68286/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf d9bb3ca3c2a1bd3f7b78adf27e82e5605f665e16
baseline v
flight 103994 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103994/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 13 saverestore-support-checkfail like 103982
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-wi
flight 68288 distros-debian-wheezy real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68288/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
baseline version:
flight 68259
jobs:
build-amd64 pass
build-armh
I guess it is a good feature for work and Xen must have it.
On Tue, 12/20/16, Jason Long wrote:
Subject: Xen and Shared Clipboard.
To: "Xen-devel"
Date: Tuesday, December 20, 2016, 10:58 PM
Hello.How can I enable Shared
Clipboard in Xen? I like
On 29/12/16 01:14, Ronald Rojas wrote:
> Create interface to interact with libxl_verions_info
> and libxl_physinfo. Also introduce proper error
> handling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ronald Rojas
Hey Ronald,
When you send a series to a public open-source project, you want it to
be a sort of idealized s
flight 103997 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103997/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf d2192f12b2d0b93416ff63ac73a3276a07d26c9e
baseline version:
ovmf f05c2e9fca28fcfb529e4
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 08:14:06PM -0500, Ronald Rojas wrote:
> From: George Dunlap
>
> Signed-off-by: George Dunlap
> ---
> benchmark.go | 18 ++
> main.go | 19 +++
> processworker.go | 18 ++
> xenworker.go | 18 +++
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:34:34AM +, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 29/12/16 01:14, Ronald Rojas wrote:
> > Create interface to interact with libxl_verions_info
> > and libxl_physinfo. Also introduce proper error
> > handling.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ronald Rojas
>
> Hey Ronald,
>
> When you sen
flight 103995 linux-4.1 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103995/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 11 guest-start fail in 103991 pass in 103995
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 11 gue
Hey Ronald! Looks like you're getting going pretty well here.
At a high level: I think I began by saying that this would probably all
be a single patch. But I think it would probably be easier to review
the different decisions made at each point by filling out the file bit
by bit, and explaining
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:52:42AM +, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:34:34AM +, George Dunlap wrote:
> > On 29/12/16 01:14, Ronald Rojas wrote:
> > > Create interface to interact with libxl_verions_info
> > > and libxl_physinfo. Also introduce proper error
> > > handling.
> > >
Hi all,
The document below is an early version of a design
proposal for PCI Passthrough in Xen. It aims to
describe from an high level perspective the interaction
with the different subsystems and how guest will be able
to discover and access PCI.
I am aware that a similar design has been posted
Hi Julien,
Wouldnt it be better if the design proposed by cavium be extended by
discussions and comeup with an agreeable to all design.
I didnt see any comments on the one I posted.
Putting an altogether new design without commenting on the one posted a month
back, might not be a right approa
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 10:11:42AM +, Jason Long wrote:
> I guess it is a good feature for work and Xen must have it.
Looking forward for the patch from you on that!
Thanks!
>
> On Tue, 12/20/16, Jason Long wrote:
>
> Subject: Xen and Shared Cli
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 03:17:20PM +0100, Daniele Palumbo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for bothering, I am following
> https://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_Serial_Console
> and
> http://www-archive.xenproject.org/files/xensummit_4/xensummit_linux_console_slides.pdf
>
> And as written in
> https://wiki.
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 68289 ovmf real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68289/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf f05c2e9fca28fcfb529e43af985605a362d2aa98
baseline v
Commit 26dbc93a ("libxl: Remove pointless hypercall from
libxl_set_memory_target") removed the call to xc_domain_getinfolist, but
it failed to notice that "info" was actually needed later.
Put that back. While at it, make the code conform to coding style
requirement.
Reported-by: Juergen Gross
S
On 29/12/2016 14:16, Jaggi, Manish wrote:
Hi Julien,
Hello Manish,
Wouldnt it be better if the design proposed by cavium be extended by
discussions and comeup with an agreeable to all design.
As I mentioned in my mail, this design is a completely different
approach (emulation vs PV). Th
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 68287 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68287/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl 15 guest-start/de
On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Andrew Cooper
wrote:
> On 27/12/16 15:53, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
> "Jan Beulich" 12/27/16 4:42 PM >>>
> Alistair Francis 12/22/16 8:14 PM >>>
Everyone seems fairly open to an override. Is a environment variable,
which if set will disable
On 29/12/2016 17:10, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 27, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Andrew Cooper
> wrote:
>> On 27/12/16 15:53, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> "Jan Beulich" 12/27/16 4:42 PM >>>
>> Alistair Francis 12/22/16 8:14 PM >>>
> Everyone seems fairly open to an override. Is a environment va
Il giorno 29 dic 2016, alle ore 15:49, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
ha scritto:
Ty for the reply Konrad,
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 03:17:20PM +0100, Daniele Palumbo wrote:
>>
>> GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX="xencons=xvc console=xvc0 console=hvc0 console=tty1
>> earlyprintk=xen nomodeset"
> You can remove the
Hi Julien,
From: Julien Grall
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2016 10:33 PM
To: Jaggi, Manish; xen-devel; Stefano Stabellini
Cc: Edgar Iglesias (edgar.igles...@xilinx.com); Steve Capper; Punit Agrawal;
Wei Chen; Campbell Sean; Shanker Donthineni; Jiandi An; Roger Pa
On 29/12/2016 18:41, Jaggi, Manish wrote:
Hi Julien,
Please configure you e-mail client to properly quote a e-mail. The
[manish] solution is hard to read.
*From:* Julien Grall
*Sent:* Thursday, December 29, 2016 10:
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 1:45 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
> At a high level: I think I began by saying that this would probably all
> be a single patch. But I think it would probably be easier to review
> the different decisions made at each point by filling out the file bit
> by bit, and explaining
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 68290 linux-4.1 real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68290/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd 9 debian-hvm-in
flight 103998 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/103998/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf 8ad05bd26b4850b5ed89867039fa989d4f256348
baseline version:
ovmf d2192f12b2d0b93416ff6
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 68292 ovmf real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68292/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf d2192f12b2d0b93416ff63ac73a3276a07d26c9e
baseline v
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 68293 ovmf real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68293/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf 8ad05bd26b4850b5ed89867039fa989d4f256348
baseline v
31 matches
Mail list logo
