>>> On 25.11.16 at 19:16, wrote:
> BTW, another thing I am afraid I will have to do is extract
> hvm_hw_timer_pm from PMTState and move it up to hvm_domain.
>
> It already has pm1a_{sts|en} and this series adds its own version of
> that register, which doesn't make sense. Instead, both will ref
>>> On 25.11.16 at 18:59, wrote:
> On 25/11/16 17:00, Julien Grall wrote:
>> On 25/11/16 15:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 25.11.16 at 16:30, wrote:
On 23/11/16 10:47, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 23.11.16 at 11:29, wrote:
>> Building latest XEN master branch
>> (58bd0c7985890e0
>>> On 25.11.16 at 20:06, wrote:
> --- a/tools/libacpi/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/libacpi/Makefile
> @@ -27,6 +27,11 @@ DSDT_FILES ?= $(C_SRC-y)
> C_SRC = $(addprefix $(ACPI_BUILD_DIR)/, $(DSDT_FILES))
> H_SRC = $(addprefix $(ACPI_BUILD_DIR)/, ssdt_s3.h ssdt_s4.h ssdt_pm.h
> ssdt_tpm.h)
>
> +MKDS
>>> On 25.11.16 at 20:04, wrote:
> As identified during review, using BUG_ON() before `lidt` will result in a
> triple fault, even on APs.
Oh, I did commit v1 instead of v2, sorry.
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich
___
Xen-de
>>> On 25.11.16 at 20:04, wrote:
> @@ -672,6 +667,15 @@ void load_system_tables(void)
> asm volatile ("lidt %0" : : "m" (idtr) );
> asm volatile ("ltr %w0" : : "rm" (TSS_ENTRY << 3) );
> asm volatile ("lldt %w0" : : "rm" (0) );
> +
> + /*
> + * Bottom-of-stack must
Hi,
I have a question that why dose xen hypervisor set entry of ept as invalid
(misconfigured) deliberately which will cause VM exit resulting from EPT
Misconfigurations.
http://xenbits.xenproject.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=aa9114edd97b292cd89b3616e3f2089471fd2201
I
find the answer in this w
Julien,
> There is no automatic test on all the possible configurations, although we
> have
> travis to test build (and not booting) a random Kconfig.
I guess there is no need to test booting of a "random" Kconfig within
the mainline anyway. The full-featured defconfig would be enough to be
prov
Hi,
I have found a commit in "PER-CPU MEMORY ALLOCATOR" will panic the
kernels that are runing on ARM64 Xen (include Domain0 and Guest).
commit 3ca45a46f8af8c4a92dd8a08eac57787242d5021
percpu: ensure the requested alignment is power of two
If I revert this commit, the Kernels can work properly o
On 28/11/16 08:44, 唐伟文 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a question that why dose xen hypervisor set entry of ept as
> invalid (misconfigured) deliberately which will cause VM exit
> resulting from EPT
> Misconfigurations.
> http://xenbits.xenproject.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=commit;h=aa9114edd97b292cd89b3616
On 22/11/2016 13:54, "Artem Mygaiev" wrote:
>On 22.11.16 15:42, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>
>>
>> The only way we could scan for ARM is if we could be given multiple
>> different streams (one per arch) to use, and Coverity have already said
>> no to this request. This is a politics problem, not a
flight 102693 xen-unstable-smoke real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102693/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 12 migrate-support-checkfail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-xl 1
On 28.11.16 12:27, Lars Kurth wrote:
> On 22/11/2016 13:54, "Artem Mygaiev" wrote:
>> On 22.11.16 15:42, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> The only way we could scan for ARM is if we could be given multiple
>>> different streams (one per arch) to use, and Coverity have already said
>>> no to this request.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 2:21 AM, Dario Faggioli
wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-11-27 at 12:23 +, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi Dario,
>>
> Hi,
>
>> On 27/11/2016 01:01, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>> > On Sat, 2016-11-26 at 12:29 +0530, Vijay Kilari wrote:
>> > I agree that we need to support vNUMA for Dom0 soon
To help with event injection improvements for the PV uses of x86_emulate(),
implement a event injection API which matches its hvm counterpart.
This is started with taking do_guest_trap() and modifying its calling API to
pv_inject_event(), subsequentally implementing the former in terms of the
latt
The emulator needs to gain an understanding of interrupts and exceptions
generated by its actions.
Move hvm_emulate_ctxt.{exn_pending,trap} into struct x86_emulate_ctxt so they
are visible to the emulator. This removes the need for the
inject_{hw_exception,sw_interrupt}() hooks, which are dropped
X86EMUL_CMPXCHG_FAILED was introduced in c/s d430aae25 in 2005. Even at the
time it alised what is now X86EMUL_RETRY (as well as what is now
X86EMUL_EXCEPTION). I am not sure why the distinction was considered useful
at the time.
It is only used twice; there is no need to call it out differently
This is the quantity of changes required to fix some edgecases in XSA-191
which were ultimately chosen not to go out in the security fix. The main
purpose of this series is to fix emulation sufficiently to allow patch 19 to
avoid opencoding all of the segmenation logic.
This version of the patche
Introduce generate_exception() for unconditional exception generation, and
replace existing uses. Both generate_exception() and generate_exception_if()
are updated to make their error code parameters optional, which removes the
use of the -1 sentinal.
The ioport_access_check() check loses the pre
When translating the second frame of a write crossing a page boundary, mask
the linear address down to the page boundary.
This causes the correct %cr2 being reported to the guest in the case that the
second frame suffers a pagefault during translation.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
---
CC: Jan Be
and move it to live with the other x86_event infrastructure in x86_emulate.h.
Switch it and x86_event.error_code to being signed, matching the rest of the
code.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant
Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich
The current code to set up emulation state is ad-hoc and error prone.
* Consistently zero all emulation state structures.
* Avoid explicitly initialising some state to 0.
* Explicitly identify all input and output state in x86_emulate_ctxt. This
involves rearanging some fields.
* Have x86_
No functional change at this point, but this is a prerequisite for forthcoming
functional changes.
Make vmx_get_segment_register() private to vmx.c like all the other Vendor
get/set functions.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich
Reviewed-by: George Dunlap
Acked-by: Kevin Tian
The x86 emulator needs to gain an understanding of interrupts and exceptions
generated by its actions. The naming choice is to match both the Intel and
AMD terms, and to avoid 'trap' specifically as it has an architectural meaning
different to its current usage.
While making this change, make oth
With hvm_virtual_to_linear_addr() capable of doing proper system-segment
relative memory accesses, avoid open-coding the address and limit calculations
locally.
When a table spans the 4GB boundary (32bit) or non-canonical boundary (64bit),
segmentation errors are now raised. Previously, the use o
Use x86_emul_pagefault() rather than pv_inject_page_fault() to cause raised
pagefaults to be known to the emulator. This requires altering the callers of
x86_emulate() to properly re-inject the event.
While fixing this, fix the singlestep behaviour. Previously, an otherwise
successful emulation
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich
Acked-by: Tim Deegan
---
CC: Paul Durrant
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c| 6 ++---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c| 56 +--
xen/arch/x86/mm/shadow/common.c | 8 +++---
Use x86_emul_{hw_exception,pagefault}() rather than
{pv,hvm}_inject_page_fault() and hvm_inject_hw_exception() to cause raised
faults to be known to the emulator. This requires altering the callers of
x86_emulate() to properly re-inject the event.
While fixing this, fix the singlestep behaviour.
Intel VT-x and AMD SVM provide access to the full segment descriptor cache via
fields in the VMCB/VMCS. However, the bits which are actually checked by
hardware and preserved across vmentry/exit are inconsistent, and the vendor
accessor functions perform inconsistent modification to the raw values
Introduce a new x86_emul_pagefault() similar to x86_emul_hw_exception(), and
use this instead of hvm_inject_page_fault() from emulation codepaths.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
---
CC: Jan Beulich
CC: Paul Durrant
v2:
* Change x86_emul_pagefault()'s error_code parameter to being signed
* Spli
Drop the call to hvm_inject_page_fault() in __hvm_copy(), and require callers
to inject the pagefault themselves.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
---
CC: Jan Beulich
CC: Paul Durrant
CC: Tim Deegan
CC: Jun Nakajima
CC: Kevin Tian
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c|
The functions use linear addresses, not virtual addresses, as no segmentation
is used. (Lots of other code in Xen makes this mistake.)
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
Acked-by: Tim Deegan
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich
---
CC: Paul Durrant
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
All system segments (GDT/IDT/LDT and TR) describe a linear address and limit,
and act similarly to user segments. However all current uses of these tables
in the emulator opencode the address calculations and limit checks. In
particular, no care is taken for access which wrap around the 4GB or
no
which is filled with pagefault information should one occur.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich
Acked-by: Tim Deegan
Reviewed-by: Paul Durrant
Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian
---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c| 8 ---
xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:16:43AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 29.10.16 at 10:59, wrote:
> > +static int __init hvm_populate_memory_range(struct domain *d, uint64_t
> > start,
> > + uint64_t size)
> > +{
> > +unsigned int order, i = 0;
> > +
>>> On 28.11.16 at 12:26, wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:16:43AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 29.10.16 at 10:59, wrote:
>> > +static int __init hvm_steal_ram(struct domain *d, unsigned long size,
>> > +paddr_t limit, paddr_t *addr)
>> > +{
>> > +uns
At 11:13 + on 28 Nov (1480331598), Andrew Cooper wrote:
> When translating the second frame of a write crossing a page boundary, mask
> the linear address down to the page boundary.
>
> This causes the correct %cr2 being reported to the guest in the case that the
> second frame suffers a pagef
At 11:13 + on 28 Nov (1480331599), Andrew Cooper wrote:
> X86EMUL_CMPXCHG_FAILED was introduced in c/s d430aae25 in 2005. Even at the
> time it alised what is now X86EMUL_RETRY (as well as what is now
> X86EMUL_EXCEPTION). I am not sure why the distinction was considered useful
> at the time.
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 28 November 2016 11:14
> To: Xen-devel
> Cc: Andrew Cooper ; Jan Beulich
> ; Paul Durrant ; Tim
> (Xen.org) ; Jun Nakajima ; Kevin
> Tian
> Subject: [PATCH v2 17/19] x86/hvm: Avoid __hvm_copy() raising #
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 28 November 2016 11:13
> To: Xen-devel
> Cc: Andrew Cooper ; George Dunlap
> ; Paul Durrant
> Subject: [PATCH v2 03/19] x86/emul: Simplfy emulation state setup
>
> The current code to set up emulation s
] Modules linked in:
[0.024708]
[0.024804] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted
4.9.0-rc7-next-20161128 #473
[0.025012] Hardware name: Foundation-v8A (DT)
[0.025162] task: 80003d87 task.stack: 80003d844000
[0.025351] PC is at pcpu_alloc+0x88/0x6c0
[0.025490
At 11:13 + on 28 Nov (1480331603), Andrew Cooper wrote:
> To help with event injection improvements for the PV uses of x86_emulate(),
> implement a event injection API which matches its hvm counterpart.
>
> This is started with taking do_guest_trap() and modifying its calling API to
> pv_injec
On 28/11/16 11:58, Tim Deegan wrote:
> At 11:13 + on 28 Nov (1480331603), Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> To help with event injection improvements for the PV uses of x86_emulate(),
>> implement a event injection API which matches its hvm counterpart.
>>
>> This is started with taking do_guest_trap() a
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 28 November 2016 11:14
> To: Xen-devel
> Cc: Andrew Cooper ; Paul Durrant
>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 16/19] x86/hvm: Rename hvm_copy_*_guest_virt() to
> hvm_copy_*_guest_linear()
>
> The functions use linea
At 11:13 + on 28 Nov (1480331605), Andrew Cooper wrote:
> The emulator needs to gain an understanding of interrupts and exceptions
> generated by its actions.
>
> Move hvm_emulate_ctxt.{exn_pending,trap} into struct x86_emulate_ctxt so they
> are visible to the emulator. This removes the need
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 03:30:17PM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 10:59:59AM +0200, Roger Pau Monne wrote:
> > Introduce a helper to parse the Dom0 kernel.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné
> > ---
> > Cc: Jan Beulich
> > Cc: Andrew Cooper
> > ---
> > Changes
flight 102686 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102686/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-armhf-armhf-xl-arndale 3 host-install(3) broken pass in 102674
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debian
flight 102688 qemu-upstream-4.6-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102688/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 13 saverestore-support-check fail REGR. vs. 99723
test-
On Mon, 2016-11-28 at 16:32 +0530, Vijay Kilari wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 2:21 AM, Dario Faggioli
> wrote:
> >
> > That makes perfect sense to me, and FWIW, is also what I'd do. In
> > fact,
> > the whole point of what I was saying was not to confuse Xen NUMA
> > support and Dom0 NUMA supp
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Hi, all!
Please find the next version of the ABI for the PV sound
after addressing review comments.
Thank you,
Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Oleksandr Grytsov
Oleksandr Andrushchenko (1):
This is the ABI for the two halves of a para-virtualized sound
driver to
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Grytsov
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Dmytryshyn
Signed-off-by: Iurii Konovalenko
---
Changes since v1:
* removed __attribute__((__packed__)) from all structures definitions
Changes since v2:
* remove
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 08:24:00AM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> Hey Wei, Anthony,
>
> Are you guys OK pushing this commit: 2667ad40919a in the
> git://xenbits.xen.org/ovmf.git
>
> tree? Without this I cannot build Xen 4.8 with TianoCore
> (--enable-ovmf).
Can you actually start a g
create ^
title it tools/acpi: Make mk_dsdt more architecture agnostic
severity it wishlist
thanks
On 28/11/16 08:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 25.11.16 at 18:59, wrote:
On 25/11/16 17:00, Julien Grall wrote:
On 25/11/16 15:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 25.11.16 at 16:30, wrote:
On 23/11/16 10:47,
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 28 November 2016 11:13
> To: Xen-devel
> Cc: Andrew Cooper ; Jan Beulich
> ; Paul Durrant
> Subject: [PATCH v2 11/19] x86/emul: Avoid raising faults behind the
> emulators back
>
> Introduce a new x86_e
On 28/11/16 12:04, Tim Deegan wrote:
> At 11:13 + on 28 Nov (1480331605), Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> The emulator needs to gain an understanding of interrupts and exceptions
>> generated by its actions.
>>
>> Move hvm_emulate_ctxt.{exn_pending,trap} into struct x86_emulate_ctxt so they
>> are visi
On Nov 26, 2016, at 4:06 AM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Julien and Xen folks,
> The tools (such as mk_dsdt) can be cross-built when it may not be
> desirable to build them on the target.
>
> The commit c4ac1077 "libxl/arm: Generate static ACPI DSDT table"
> introduced support of ARM64 in mk_dsdt but
flight 102691 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102691/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf 4e3b05a49f454bc257252ae9090421e3c8447737
baseline version:
ovmf 418373a1cd97abc0c0e35
Hi Jan,
On 28/11/16 08:10, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 25.11.16 at 20:06, wrote:
--- a/tools/libacpi/Makefile
+++ b/tools/libacpi/Makefile
@@ -27,6 +27,11 @@ DSDT_FILES ?= $(C_SRC-y)
C_SRC = $(addprefix $(ACPI_BUILD_DIR)/, $(DSDT_FILES))
H_SRC = $(addprefix $(ACPI_BUILD_DIR)/, ssdt_s3.h ssdt_s4.h
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 28 November 2016 11:13
> To: Xen-devel
> Cc: Andrew Cooper ; George Dunlap
> ; Paul Durrant
> Subject: [PATCH v2 03/19] x86/emul: Simplfy emulation state setup
>
> The current code to set up emulation s
Hi, all!
I cannot find any definition of XC_PAGE_SIZE for Linux kernel.
Is it by intention or just missed?
I am writing a PV front drivers now and forced either to define
XC_PAGE_SIZE == PAGE_SIZE or use PAGE_SIZE directly. Strictly
speaking both workarounds are not correct.
Thank you,
Olek
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 28 November 2016 11:14
> To: Xen-devel
> Cc: Andrew Cooper ; Paul Durrant
>
> Subject: [PATCH v2 15/19] x86/hvm: Reimplement hvm_copy_*_nofault() in
> terms of no pagefault_info
>
> No functional change
On 28/11/16 11:56, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com]
>> Sent: 28 November 2016 11:14
>> To: Xen-devel
>> Cc: Andrew Cooper ; Jan Beulich
>> ; Paul Durrant ; Tim
>> (Xen.org) ; Jun Nakajima ; Kevin
>> Tian
>> Subject: [PATCH
Processing commands for x...@bugs.xenproject.org:
> create ^
Created new bug #55 rooted at
`<583bf2b3027800122...@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>'
Title: `Re: [Xen-devel] XEN tools for ARM64 build issue'
> title it tools/acpi: Make mk_dsdt more architecture agnostic
Set title for #55 to `tools/acpi:
Hi Andrew,
On 25/11/16 19:12, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 25/11/16 19:06, Julien Grall wrote:
The tools (such as mk_dsdt) can be cross-built when it may not be
desirable to build them on the target.
The commit c4ac1077 "libxl/arm: Generate static ACPI DSDT table"
introduced support of ARM64 in mk_
On 28/11/16 13:00, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On 25/11/16 19:12, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 25/11/16 19:06, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> The tools (such as mk_dsdt) can be cross-built when it may not be
>>> desirable to build them on the target.
>>>
>>> The commit c4ac1077 "libxl/arm: Generate
On 28/11/16 13:01, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Andrew Cooper
>> Sent: 28 November 2016 12:58
>> To: Paul Durrant ; Xen-devel > de...@lists.xen.org>
>> Cc: Jan Beulich ; Tim (Xen.org) ; Jun
>> Nakajima ; Kevin Tian
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 17/19] x86/hvm: Avoid __hvm
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Cooper
> Sent: 28 November 2016 12:58
> To: Paul Durrant ; Xen-devel de...@lists.xen.org>
> Cc: Jan Beulich ; Tim (Xen.org) ; Jun
> Nakajima ; Kevin Tian
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 17/19] x86/hvm: Avoid __hvm_copy() raising #PF
> behind the emulators back
The tools (such as mk_dsdt) can be cross-built when it may not be
desirable to build them on the target.
The commit c4ac1077 "libxl/arm: Generate static ACPI DSDT table"
introduced support of ARM64 in mk_dsdt but also break cross-building
tools because the ACPI tables are not correct.
While mk_ds
On 21/11/16 15:56, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> Commit 9c17d96500f7 ("xen/gntdev: Grant maps should not be subject to
> NUMA balancing") set VM_IO flag to prevent grant maps from being
> subjected to NUMA balancing.
>
> It was discovered recently that this flag causes get_user_pages() to
> always fail
On 28/11/16 12:56, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
Hi, all!
Hi,
I cannot find any definition of XC_PAGE_SIZE for Linux kernel.
Is it by intention or just missed?
I am writing a PV front drivers now and forced either to define
XC_PAGE_SIZE == PAGE_SIZE or use PAGE_SIZE directly. Strictly
On 11/28/2016 03:17 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
On 28/11/16 12:56, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
Hi, all!
Hi,
I cannot find any definition of XC_PAGE_SIZE for Linux kernel.
Is it by intention or just missed?
I am writing a PV front drivers now and forced either to define
XC_PAGE_SIZE == P
>>> On 28.11.16 at 13:30, wrote:
> + * Request open - open a PCM stream for playback or capture:
> + * 0 1 23
> octet
> + * +-+-+-+-+
> + * | id
Usually, I've seen (null) domains are not running but their Qemu DMs are
running. You could probably remove the (null) from the list by using "kill
-9" on the qemu pids.
On Nov 27, 2016 11:55 PM, "Michael Schinzel"
wrote:
> Good Morning,
>
>
>
> we have some issues with our Xen Hosts. It seems i
>>> On 28.11.16 at 14:13, wrote:
> The tools (such as mk_dsdt) can be cross-built when it may not be
> desirable to build them on the target.
>
> The commit c4ac1077 "libxl/arm: Generate static ACPI DSDT table"
> introduced support of ARM64 in mk_dsdt but also break cross-building
> tools because
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 04:41:22AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 28.11.16 at 12:26, wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:16:43AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 29.10.16 at 10:59, wrote:
> >> > +static int __init hvm_steal_ram(struct domain *d, unsigned long size,
> >> > +
Hi,
On 28/11/16 13:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 28.11.16 at 14:13, wrote:
The tools (such as mk_dsdt) can be cross-built when it may not be
desirable to build them on the target.
The commit c4ac1077 "libxl/arm: Generate static ACPI DSDT table"
introduced support of ARM64 in mk_dsdt but also brea
On 11/24/2016 09:13 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky
(even though it's already been applied)
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>>> On 28.11.16 at 14:37, wrote:
> On 28/11/16 13:30, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> However, ...
>>
>>> --- a/tools/libacpi/mk_dsdt.c
>>> +++ b/tools/libacpi/mk_dsdt.c
>>> @@ -17,9 +17,9 @@
>>> #include
>>> #include
>>> #include
>>> -#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
>>> +#if defined(CONF
On 11/24/2016 10:31 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 24.11.16 at 16:14, wrote:
>> When dumping ACPI C states, here's how things look like for _all_ CPUs:
>> Nov 23 13:13:00.382134 (XEN) ==cpu3==
>> Nov 23 13:13:00.382157 (XEN) active state: C-1
>> Nov 23 13:13:00.390096 (XEN) max_cstate:
>>> On 28.11.16 at 14:30, wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 04:41:22AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 28.11.16 at 12:26, wrote:
>> > On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 10:16:43AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> >>> On 29.10.16 at 10:59, wrote:
>> >> > +saved_current = current;
>> >> > +
Hi Vijay,
On 26/11/16 06:59, Vijay Kilari wrote:
> Hi,
>
>Below basic write up on DT based NUMA feature support for arm64 platform.
> I have attempted to get NUMA support, However I face below issues. I would
> like
> to discuss these issues. Please let me know your comments on this. Yet to
Resume is sometimes silently failing for HVM guests. Getting the
xc_domain_resume() and libxl__domain_resume_device_model() in the
reverse order than what is in the suspend code fixes the problem.
Signed-off-by: Cédric Bosdonnat
---
tools/libxl/libxl_dom_suspend.c | 12 ++--
1 file chang
On 11/28/2016 03:27 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 28.11.16 at 13:30, wrote:
+ * Request open - open a PCM stream for playback or capture:
+ * 0 1 23
octet
+ * +-+-+-+-+
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 68112 ovmf real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68112/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed as required
version targeted for testing:
ovmf 418373a1cd97abc0c0e3557f7a00105291829e6f
baseline v
On 11/28/2016 06:13 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Intel VT-x and AMD SVM provide access to the full segment descriptor cache via
> fields in the VMCB/VMCS. However, the bits which are actually checked by
> hardware and preserved across vmentry/exit are inconsistent, and the vendor
> accessor function
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 06:30:58AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 28.11.16 at 14:13, wrote:
> > The tools (such as mk_dsdt) can be cross-built when it may not be
> > desirable to build them on the target.
> >
> > The commit c4ac1077 "libxl/arm: Generate static ACPI DSDT table"
> > introduced
At 12:48 + on 28 Nov (1480337304), Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 28/11/16 12:04, Tim Deegan wrote:
> > At 11:13 + on 28 Nov (1480331605), Andrew Cooper wrote:
> >> +/*
> >> * NB. We do not unshadow on X86EMUL_EXCEPTION. It's not clear that it
> >> * would be a good unshadow hint
Hi Oleksandr,
On 28/11/16 14:12, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 11/28/2016 03:27 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
+ *
+ * gref_dir_next_page - grant_ref_t, reference to the next page
describing
+ * page directory. Must be 0 if no more pages in the list.
If I am not mistaken 0 is a valid grant.
On 28/11/16 14:24, Tim Deegan wrote:
> At 12:48 + on 28 Nov (1480337304), Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 28/11/16 12:04, Tim Deegan wrote:
>>> At 11:13 + on 28 Nov (1480331605), Andrew Cooper wrote:
+/*
* NB. We do not unshadow on X86EMUL_EXCEPTION. It's not clear that it
>>
Hi,
At 11:13 + on 28 Nov (1480331610), Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Use x86_emul_{hw_exception,pagefault}() rather than
> {pv,hvm}_inject_page_fault() and hvm_inject_hw_exception() to cause raised
> faults to be known to the emulator. This requires altering the callers of
> x86_emulate() to properl
At 11:13 + on 28 Nov (1480331614), Andrew Cooper wrote:
> Drop the call to hvm_inject_page_fault() in __hvm_copy(), and require callers
> to inject the pagefault themselves.
This seems like it'd be easy to forget to DTRT with the fault,
especially in code being ported forward across this serie
On 11/28/2016 04:24 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Oleksandr,
On 28/11/16 14:12, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 11/28/2016 03:27 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
+ *
+ * gref_dir_next_page - grant_ref_t, reference to the next page
describing
+ * page directory. Must be 0 if no more pages in the list.
Hi Oleksandr,
On 28/11/16 14:56, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 11/28/2016 04:24 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Oleksandr,
On 28/11/16 14:12, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 11/28/2016 03:27 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
+ *
+ * gref_dir_next_page - grant_ref_t, reference to the next page
describ
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 12:38:08PM +, Anthony PERARD wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 08:24:00AM -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > Hey Wei, Anthony,
> >
> > Are you guys OK pushing this commit: 2667ad40919a in the
> > git://xenbits.xen.org/ovmf.git
> >
> > tree? Without this I cann
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Hi Vijay,
>
> On 26/11/16 06:59, Vijay Kilari wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>Below basic write up on DT based NUMA feature support for arm64 platform.
>> I have attempted to get NUMA support, However I face below issues. I would
>> like
>> to discu
flight 68113 distros-debian-sid real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/68113/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-amd64-sid-netboot-pygrub 9 debian-di-install fail like 68072
test-amd64-i386-i38
On 11/22/2016 09:08 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 22.11.16 at 13:38, wrote:
>> On 11/22/2016 06:34 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 21.11.16 at 22:00, wrote:
PVH guests will have ACPI accesses emulated by the hypervisor
as opposed to QEMU (as is the case for HVM guests)
Suppo
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 08:48:30AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 11/24/2016 10:31 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 24.11.16 at 16:14, wrote:
> >> When dumping ACPI C states, here's how things look like for _all_ CPUs:
> >> Nov 23 13:13:00.382134 (XEN) ==cpu3==
> >> Nov 23 13:13:00.382157 (XEN
flight 102689 qemu-upstream-4.7-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/102689/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-xsm 13 saverestore-support-check fail REGR. vs. 100711
test
Hello,
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 11:59:15AM +, Julien Grall wrote:
> > commit 3ca45a46f8af8c4a92dd8a08eac57787242d5021
> > percpu: ensure the requested alignment is power of two
>
> It would have been useful to specify the tree used. In this case,
> this commit comes from linux-next.
I'm surpr
On 11/28/2016 05:00 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Oleksandr,
On 28/11/16 14:56, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 11/28/2016 04:24 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Oleksandr,
On 28/11/16 14:12, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 11/28/2016 03:27 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
+ *
+ * gref_dir_next_page - gr
1 - 100 of 179 matches
Mail list logo
