At 11:13 +0000 on 28 Nov (1480331614), Andrew Cooper wrote: > Drop the call to hvm_inject_page_fault() in __hvm_copy(), and require callers > to inject the pagefault themselves.
This seems like it'd be easy to forget to DTRT with the fault, especially in code being ported forward across this series. Would it be better to have hvm_copy &c take a callback function instead of a pfinfo pointer? (In any case, this can have my ack for the shadow-code change.) Cheers, Tim. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
