On 12/10/15 18:32, Wei Liu wrote:
> Hi all
>
>
>
> Please express your preference with -2 (strongly argue against), -1
> (not happy but not against), +1 (happy but won't argue for) and +2
> (happy and argue for).
With my XenServer hat on, the precise release doesn't matter too much.
For a XenSer
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] RFC: Survey on release cycle"):
> On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 18:32 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> > The same stable release scheme applies (18 months full support + 18
> > months security fixes). Encourage more people to step up to share the
Wei Liu writes ("[Xen-devel] RFC: Survey on release cycle"):
> Please express your preference with -2 (strongly argue against), -1
> (not happy but not against), +1 (happy but won't argue for) and +2
> (happy and argue for).
>
> # 6 months release cycle + current stable release scheme
>
> The sam
On 10/12/2015 07:32 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
Please express your preference with -2 (strongly argue against), -1
(not happy but not against), +1 (happy but won't argue for) and +2
(happy and argue for).
# 6 months release cycle + current stable release scheme
0
# 6 months release cycle + LTS sche
On Thu, Oct 15, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 18:32 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
>
> > # 6 months release cycle + current stable release scheme
> # 6 months release cycle + extended security support
>
> +1 to either of these, but +2 for picking one of them.
+1, as Ian said.
> (not rea
On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 18:32 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> # 6 months release cycle + current stable release scheme
# 6 months release cycle + extended security support
+1 to either of these, but +2 for picking one of them.
(not really sure how to express that in a vote, sorry).
> # 6 months release
>>> On 12.10.15 at 19:32, wrote:
> # 6 months release cycle + current stable release scheme
>
> The same stable release scheme applies (18 months full support + 18
> months security fixes). Encourage more people to step up to share the
> maintenance burden if necessary. Automate part of the workf
On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 14:08 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 01:21:11PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > Aside: I'm a bit confused regarding whether our "stable release scheme" is
> > defined in terms of number of concurrently supported releases or in terms
> > of an absolute time.
>
On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 01:21:11PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 18:32 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> >
> [...]
> > There are several general options on how to proceed that I summarise
> > from previous discussions. Note that because there are too many moving
> > parts I pick some of
On Wed, 2015-10-14 at 06:30 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 14.10.15 at 14:21, wrote:
> > Aside: I'm a bit confused regarding whether our "stable release scheme"
> > is
> > defined in terms of number of concurrently supported releases or in
> > terms
> > of an absolute time.
> > http://wiki.
>>> On 14.10.15 at 14:21, wrote:
> Aside: I'm a bit confused regarding whether our "stable release scheme" is
> defined in terms of number of concurrently supported releases or in terms
> of an absolute time.
> http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Xen_Project_Maintenance_Releases definitely
> says it
On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 18:32 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
>
[...]
> There are several general options on how to proceed that I summarise
> from previous discussions. Note that because there are too many moving
> parts I pick some of my preferences as a starting point for the
> discussion.
I take it sugge
On Mon, 12 Oct 2015, Wei Liu wrote:
> Hi all
>
> We've had two separate discussions about release cycles, one for
> normal release [0], the other for changes in stable release
> maintenance and possible long term supported releases [1]. There were
> overwhelming support for having a shorter releas
On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 18:32 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Please express your preference with -2 (strongly argue against), -1
> (not happy but not against), +1 (happy but won't argue for) and +2
> (happy and argue for).
>
> # 6 months release cycle + current stable release scheme
>
> The
14 matches
Mail list logo
