On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 17:39 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > IMHO this is fine. It essentially means that for xl users there is some
> > delayed gratification wrt the promise of migration between non-alike
> > dom0s. The migration from 4.5(legacy)->4.6(v2) won't support such
> > migrations, but the
在 11/26/2014 03:54 AM, Andrew Cooper 写道:
Hello,
The purpose of this email is to plan how to progress the migrationv2
series through to being merged. I believe I have CC'd everyone with a
specific interest in this area, but apologies if I have missed anyone.
Migration v2 is in exclusive use i
On 26/11/14 16:50, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 19:54 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> 3) Libxl and xl support
>>
>> Libxl and xl have as many problems as the libxc code did when it comes
>> to incompatible wire formats and layering violations. In particular, it
>> is not possible to
On 26/11/14 16:44, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 19:54 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> There is an xl/libxl part of the migration v2 series which attempts to
>> rectify this all in one go, as there is no alternative way of doing so.
>> The libxl section of the series is certainly not
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 19:54 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> 3) Libxl and xl support
>
> Libxl and xl have as many problems as the libxc code did when it comes
> to incompatible wire formats and layering violations. In particular, it
> is not possible to determine the bitness of the sending
> libxl-
On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 19:54 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> There is an xl/libxl part of the migration v2 series which attempts to
> rectify this all in one go, as there is no alternative way of doing so.
> The libxl section of the series is certainly not yet complete, but
> specific queries to the
On Wed, Nov 26, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> It is certainly my hope going forward that different knobs can be
> exposed. One thing I think would be interesting is some proper
> calculations of the delta in the dirty set, and offering a threshold
> which chooses between "pause and complete" or "abort t
On 26/11/14 08:09, Olaf Hering wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>
>> The purpose of this email is to plan how to progress the migrationv2
>> series through to being merged. I believe I have CC'd everyone with a
>> specific interest in this area, but apologies if I have missed anyone.
On Tue, Nov 25, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> The purpose of this email is to plan how to progress the migrationv2
> series through to being merged. I believe I have CC'd everyone with a
> specific interest in this area, but apologies if I have missed anyone.
While you mow that lawn, did you guys think
