On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 17:39 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: > > IMHO this is fine. It essentially means that for xl users there is some > > delayed gratification wrt the promise of migration between non-alike > > dom0s. The migration from 4.5(legacy)->4.6(v2) won't support such > > migrations, but the next step from 4.6(v2)->4.7(v2) will. > > Two options exist. > > 1) Assume that the sending bitness is the same as the receiving > bitness. This is already the status quo, and will require that the two > dom0s are the same width.
As I said above I think this is absolutely acceptable as a transitional step. > 2) Allow the administrator to specify the bitness of the sending side. > In this case, xl 4.5(legacy)->4.6(v2) works even cross-bitness. If this is trivial to plumb in and you are motivated to do so then this seems like a reasonable enough "stretch goal". Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
