>>> On 05.10.15 at 16:57, wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 08:46:03AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 05.10.15 at 16:26, wrote:
>> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 04:46:55AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> >>> On 05.10.15 at 10:49, wrote:
>> >> > On 03/10/15 19:39, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 08:46:03AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 05.10.15 at 16:26, wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 04:46:55AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 05.10.15 at 10:49, wrote:
> >> > On 03/10/15 19:39, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >> >> I get compile warnings telling me t
>>> On 05.10.15 at 16:26, wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 04:46:55AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 05.10.15 at 10:49, wrote:
>> > On 03/10/15 19:39, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> >> I get compile warnings telling me that
>> >>s->connections[i].fd == fd
>> >>
>> >> 'i' may be past the
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 04:46:55AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 05.10.15 at 10:49, wrote:
> > On 03/10/15 19:39, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >> I get compile warnings telling me that
> >>s->connections[i].fd == fd
> >>
> >> 'i' may be past the array. Adding in an extra condition
> >>
>>> On 05.10.15 at 10:49, wrote:
> On 03/10/15 19:39, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> I get compile warnings telling me that
>>s->connections[i].fd == fd
>>
>> 'i' may be past the array. Adding in an extra condition
>> on the loop fixes that.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
>
> Re
On 03/10/15 19:39, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> I get compile warnings telling me that
>s->connections[i].fd == fd
>
> 'i' may be past the array. Adding in an extra condition
> on the loop fixes that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper
Furthermore, I can't
