On 14/01/15 11:24, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 10:52 +, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi Ian,
>>
>> On 14/01/2015 10:28, Ian Campbell wrote:
> (I suppose someone needs to patch libxc et al to actually use this)
The primary consumer, as said in the description, is meant to be
>
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 11:18 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 14.01.15 at 11:28, wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 08:46 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >>> On 13.01.15 at 17:35, wrote:
> >> > On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 16:21 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> >> --- /dev/null
> >> >> +++ b/xen/include/pub
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 10:52 +, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> On 14/01/2015 10:28, Ian Campbell wrote:
> >>> (I suppose someone needs to patch libxc et al to actually use this)
> >>
> >> The primary consumer, as said in the description, is meant to be
> >> hvmloader. But yes, other tools pa
>>> On 14.01.15 at 11:28, wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 08:46 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 13.01.15 at 17:35, wrote:
>> > On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 16:21 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >> --- /dev/null
>> >> +++ b/xen/include/public/errno.h
>> >> @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
>> >> +#ifndef __XEN_PUBLIC_ERR
Hi Ian,
On 14/01/2015 10:28, Ian Campbell wrote:
(I suppose someone needs to patch libxc et al to actually use this)
The primary consumer, as said in the description, is meant to be
hvmloader. But yes, other tools parts may also want to follow
that.
/me wonders how libxc has been getting awa
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 08:46 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 13.01.15 at 17:35, wrote:
> > On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 16:21 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/xen/include/public/errno.h
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
> >> +#ifndef __XEN_PUBLIC_ERRNO_H__
> >> +
> >> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>
>>> On 13.01.15 at 17:40, wrote:
> On 13/01/15 16:21, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> Now that we have two cases where patches against hvmloader got
>> submitted needing to include the hypervisor's errno.h (for the host's
>> system header not necessarily reflecting the correct numbers), take
>> this as a st
>>> On 13.01.15 at 17:35, wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 16:21 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/xen/include/public/errno.h
>> @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
>> +#ifndef __XEN_PUBLIC_ERRNO_H__
>> +
>> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>> +
>> +#define XEN_ERRNO(name, value) XEN_##name = value,
>> +enum xe
On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 16:57 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH RFC] make error codes a formal part of the
> ABI"):
> > On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 16:21 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > There's on small block commented with TBD left in the public header.
> > > This is the main r
>>> On 13.01.15 at 17:57, wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH RFC] make error codes a formal part of the
> ABI"):
>> On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 16:21 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> > There's on small block commented with TBD left in the public header.
>> > This is the main reason for the submissio
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH RFC] make error codes a formal part of the
ABI"):
> On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 16:21 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > There's on small block commented with TBD left in the public header.
> > This is the main reason for the submission being RFC. While we don't
> > currently
On 13/01/15 16:21, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Now that we have two cases where patches against hvmloader got
> submitted needing to include the hypervisor's errno.h (for the host's
> system header not necessarily reflecting the correct numbers), take
> this as a strong sign that we need to make the error
On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 16:21 +, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Now that we have two cases where patches against hvmloader got
> submitted needing to include the hypervisor's errno.h (for the host's
> system header not necessarily reflecting the correct numbers), take
> this as a strong sign that we need t
13 matches
Mail list logo
