>>> On 13.01.15 at 17:57, <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH RFC] make error codes a formal part of the
> ABI"):
>> On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 16:21 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> > There's on small block commented with TBD left in the public header.
>> > This is the main reason for the submission being RFC. While we don't
>> > currently use these error codes, I'm not sure if we should leave all
>> > or some of them out for the time being.
>>
>> I say lets omit any we don't use for now.
>
> Is it possible that anyone is using the existing header file where
> these values were defined ? If so their code might say
> case ELOOP:
> which would not compile when they switched to the new header.
The existing header is a hypervisor private one. Any code outside
the hypervisor using it imo deserves to get broken.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
