>>> On 17.02.16 at 15:35, wrote:
> On 15/02/16 08:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 15.02.16 at 09:26, wrote:
>>> On 15/02/2016 07:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
@@ -5395,7 +5398,7 @@ int hvm_do_hypercall(struct cpu_user_reg
}
#endif
-regs->_eax = hvm_hypercall3
On 15/02/16 08:52, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 15.02.16 at 09:26, wrote:
>> On 15/02/2016 07:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> @@ -5395,7 +5398,7 @@ int hvm_do_hypercall(struct cpu_user_reg
>>> }
>>> #endif
>>>
>>> -regs->_eax = hvm_hypercall32_table[eax](ebx, ecx, edx, esi, edi,
>>>
>>> On 15.02.16 at 09:26, wrote:
> On 15/02/2016 07:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> @@ -5395,7 +5398,7 @@ int hvm_do_hypercall(struct cpu_user_reg
>> }
>> #endif
>>
>> -regs->_eax = hvm_hypercall32_table[eax](ebx, ecx, edx, esi, edi,
>> ebp);
>> +regs->_eax = hypercall_table
On 15/02/2016 07:42, Jan Beulich wrote:
> @@ -5395,7 +5398,7 @@ int hvm_do_hypercall(struct cpu_user_reg
> }
> #endif
>
> -regs->_eax = hvm_hypercall32_table[eax](ebx, ecx, edx, esi, edi,
> ebp);
> +regs->_eax = hypercall_table[eax].compat(ebx, ecx, edx, esi, edi,
> eb