On 15/02/2016 07:42, Jan Beulich wrote: > @@ -5395,7 +5398,7 @@ int hvm_do_hypercall(struct cpu_user_reg > } > #endif > > - regs->_eax = hvm_hypercall32_table[eax](ebx, ecx, edx, esi, edi, > ebp); > + regs->_eax = hypercall_table[eax].compat(ebx, ecx, edx, esi, edi, > ebp); >
I know its in a different translation unit, but we already have a hypercall_table and it is a global symbol. Please could we retain the hvm_ prefix here. Otherwise, Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
