Please use clear subject line in the future. Currently it's not very
descriptive. Something like "Introduction of netsted HVM test case" is
better.
Wei.
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 05:27 +, Hu, Robert wrote:
> > But I'm not convinced that these patches take the right approach to
> > achieving that. There seems to be a great deal of duplication of
> > code. I think we should have a conversation about what moving parts
> > are necessary for nested HV
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Jackson [mailto:ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 28, 2014 8:26 PM
> To: Pang, LongtaoX
> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; ian.campb...@citrix.com; wei.l...@citrix.com;
> Hu, Robert; Zheng, Di
> Subject: Re: [OSSTEST PATCH 0/4] Introduction of
longtao.pang writes ("[OSSTEST PATCH 0/4] Introduction of the patches."):
> We updated these patchs about adding Nested test job into OSSTest.
Thanks for your contribution.
Having some testing of nested HVM would be good.
But I'm not convinced that these patches take the right approach to
achiev
