On Mon, 2014-12-01 at 05:27 +0000, Hu, Robert wrote: > > But I'm not convinced that these patches take the right approach to > > achieving that. There seems to be a great deal of duplication of > > code. I think we should have a conversation about what moving parts > > are necessary for nested HVM testing. > Agree with you we shall reuse existing ts-* if possible. Actually I had > thought of this approach but later I > defeated myself because I thought ts-* shall compromise itself as a whole > test case and better not to touch them. > Now I see that ts- is more like components to constitute a test case (my > current understanding is your job == test cases).
Have you seen the README at the top-level of osstest.git? It starts with a terminology section, which includes defining what a job is: a sequence of test steps, which could also be called a test case. The ts-* prefix stands for test step BTW. There is certainly scope for improving the docs though so please do ask if anything is unclear and we can improve the docs. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
