Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some testsupport APIs

2015-03-24 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some testsupport APIs"): > On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 03:34 +, Hu, Robert wrote: > > > Make it an option to the function which creates the configuration in the > > > first place. Quoting myself from earlier in this very thread: >

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some testsupport APIs

2015-03-24 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 03:34 +, Hu, Robert wrote: > > Make it an option to the function which creates the configuration in the > > first place. Quoting myself from earlier in this very thread: > Then we still need to designate to use e1000 device somewhere; say, in > ts-nested-setup, we store

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some testsupport APIs

2015-03-24 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 03:25 +, Hu, Robert wrote: > Though no harm as far as I see now, I cannot forcast any harm in the > future. Anyway, this 'nestedhvm' is for a nested usage. Better to enable > it when we are actually going enable a nested environment. > Practically, we can do it in either

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some testsupport APIs

2015-03-24 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 05:13 +, Pang, LongtaoX wrote: > So, maybe I should write some code in 'ts-nested-setup' script to > implement ssh into L1, edit sources.list and comment out the CDROM > repo entry. Please do it in ts-debian-hvm-install, either as a postinst step or, better (IMHO), by arr

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some testsupport APIs

2015-03-24 Thread Wei Liu
jack...@eu.citrix.com; > > xen-devel@lists.xen.org > > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some > > testsupport APIs > > > > On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 17:29 +, Wei Liu wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:45:55PM +, Ian Camp

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some testsupport APIs

2015-03-23 Thread Pang, LongtaoX
> -Original Message- > From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campb...@citrix.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2015 1:37 AM > To: Wei Liu > Cc: Pang, LongtaoX; Hu, Robert; ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com; > xen-devel@lists.xen.org > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATC

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some testsupport APIs

2015-03-23 Thread Hu, Robert
> -Original Message- > From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campb...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 5:50 PM > To: Hu, Robert > Cc: Pang, LongtaoX; xen-devel@lists.xen.org; ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com; > wei.l...@citrix.com > Subject: Re: [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some te

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some testsupport APIs

2015-03-23 Thread Hu, Robert
> -Original Message- > From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campb...@citrix.com] > Sent: Monday, March 23, 2015 5:50 PM > To: Hu, Robert > Cc: Pang, LongtaoX; xen-devel@lists.xen.org; ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com; > wei.l...@citrix.com > Subject: Re: [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some te

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some testsupport APIs

2015-03-23 Thread Ian Campbell
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 17:29 +, Wei Liu wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:45:55PM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 16:20 +, Pang, LongtaoX wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > The editconfig_cd thing -- yet another thing which Ian questioned > > > > > > > and which it was agre

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some testsupport APIs

2015-03-23 Thread Ian Campbell
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 17:19 +, Wei Liu wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:20:08PM +, Pang, LongtaoX wrote: > > > > > > > > > The editconfig_cd thing -- yet another thing which Ian questioned > > > > > > and which it was agreed you would change but you haven't. > > > > > > > > > > > For th

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some testsupport APIs

2015-03-23 Thread Wei Liu
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:45:55PM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 16:20 +, Pang, LongtaoX wrote: > > > > > > > > > The editconfig_cd thing -- yet another thing which Ian questioned > > > > > > and which it was agreed you would change but you haven't. > > > > > > > > > > > F

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some testsupport APIs

2015-03-23 Thread Wei Liu
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 04:20:08PM +, Pang, LongtaoX wrote: > > > > > > > The editconfig_cd thing -- yet another thing which Ian questioned > > > > > and which it was agreed you would change but you haven't. > > > > > > > > > For this question, I have sent a mail about it.(2015-03-04) After >

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some testsupport APIs

2015-03-23 Thread Ian Campbell
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 16:20 +, Pang, LongtaoX wrote: > > > > > > > The editconfig_cd thing -- yet another thing which Ian questioned > > > > > and which it was agreed you would change but you haven't. > > > > > > > > > For this question, I have sent a mail about it.(2015-03-04) After > > > > f

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some testsupport APIs

2015-03-23 Thread Pang, LongtaoX
> > > > > The editconfig_cd thing -- yet another thing which Ian questioned > > > > and which it was agreed you would change but you haven't. > > > > > > > For this question, I have sent a mail about it.(2015-03-04) After > > > finishing L1 guest VM installation, we need to change L1 guest boot >

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some testsupport APIs

2015-03-23 Thread Ian Campbell
On Mon, 2015-03-23 at 06:31 +, Hu, Robert wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campb...@citrix.com] > > Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 8:20 PM > > To: Pang, LongtaoX > > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com; wei.l...@citrix.com; > > Hu, Robert

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some testsupport APIs

2015-03-22 Thread Hu, Robert
> -Original Message- > From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campb...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 8:20 PM > To: Pang, LongtaoX > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com; wei.l...@citrix.com; > Hu, Robert > Subject: Re: [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some te

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some testsupport APIs

2015-03-20 Thread Ian Campbell
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 12:59 +, Pang, LongtaoX wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campb...@citrix.com] > > Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 8:20 PM > > To: Pang, LongtaoX > > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com; wei.l...@citrix.com; > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some testsupport APIs

2015-03-20 Thread Pang, LongtaoX
> -Original Message- > From: Ian Campbell [mailto:ian.campb...@citrix.com] > Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 8:20 PM > To: Pang, LongtaoX > Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com; wei.l...@citrix.com; > Hu, Robert > Subject: Re: [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some testsupport APIs

2015-03-20 Thread Ian Campbell
On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 12:09 +, Pang, LongtaoX wrote: > Add xen-devel in mail loop. Here is what I wrong in reply to the private version without noticing that it was private. On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 11:59 +, Pang, LongtaoX wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Ian Campbell [m

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some testsupport APIs

2015-03-20 Thread Pang, LongtaoX
Add xen-devel in mail loop. > -Original Message- > From: Pang, LongtaoX > Sent: Friday, March 20, 2015 7:59 PM > To: 'Ian Campbell' > Cc: ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com; wei.l...@citrix.com; Hu, Robert > Subject: RE: [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some testsupport > APIs > > > > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [OSSTEST Nested PATCH 2/6] Add and expose some testsupport APIs

2015-03-19 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 14:16 -0400, longtao.pang wrote: > From: "longtao.pang" > > 1. Designate vif model to 'e1000', otherwise, with default device model, > the L1 eth0 interface disappear, hence xenbridge cannot work. > Maybe this limitation can be removed later after some fix it. For now, we >