On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 07:35:16AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 17.05.16 at 15:23, wrote:
> > I would like to propose backporting some mini-os patches to mini-os.git
> > stable-4.6 branch and update Config.mk in 4.6.
>
> On top of the recently backported ones?
Yes.
>
> > I guess I will b
>>> On 17.05.16 at 15:23, wrote:
> I would like to propose backporting some mini-os patches to mini-os.git
> stable-4.6 branch and update Config.mk in 4.6.
On top of the recently backported ones?
> I guess I will bring that up with Samuel and then post patch here?
Yes please.
Jan
___
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 05:33:48AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
> All,
>
> with this due in about three weeks, please indicate backports you find
> missing from its staging tree but you deem necessary in the release.
> I already have commit 556c69f4ef ("x86/PoD: skip eager reclaim when
> possible") q
>>> On 17.05.16 at 14:45, wrote:
> Should we backport something like
> 013396f93ee2d4ec416f701ae420c683b7327230 to help users avoid the
> deadlock present when using a domU with a Linux kernel 3.14 or newer?
>
> If yes then you might want the init script fixes to make the daemons use
> that as we
On 5/17/16 6:33 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> All,
>
> with this due in about three weeks, please indicate backports you find
> missing from its staging tree but you deem necessary in the release.
> I already have commit 556c69f4ef ("x86/PoD: skip eager reclaim when
> possible") queued, and I'm undecid
All,
with this due in about three weeks, please indicate backports you find
missing from its staging tree but you deem necessary in the release.
I already have commit 556c69f4ef ("x86/PoD: skip eager reclaim when
possible") queued, and I'm undecided about af07377007 ("IOMMU/x86:
per-domain control
