On 5/17/16 6:33 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> All,
>
> with this due in about three weeks, please indicate backports you find
> missing from its staging tree but you deem necessary in the release.
> I already have commit 556c69f4ef ("x86/PoD: skip eager reclaim when
> possible") queued, and I'm undecided about af07377007 ("IOMMU/x86:
> per-domain control structure is not HVM-specific") as well as the
> SMEP/SMAP fix (which first needs at least one more adjustment on
> master anyway).
>
> Thanks, Jan
> Should we backport something like 013396f93ee2d4ec416f701ae420c683b7327230 to help users avoid the deadlock present when using a domU with a Linux kernel 3.14 or newer? If yes then you might want the init script fixes to make the daemons use that as well which were 1367e9e5ba4d1612e303123ec0bbf961100fcfa1 and 9ec68500009322fc148742d9aa85596e03c3c2be. A no is ok. -- Doug Goldstein
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
