Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 63948: regressions
- FAIL [and 1 more messages] [and 1 more messages]"):
> On 16.11.15 at 17:14, wrote:
> > This will allow us to think about the medium-term fix without the
> > short-term breakage causing pain.
>>> On 16.11.15 at 17:14, wrote:
> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 63948:
> regressions -
> FAIL [and 1 more messages] [and 1 more messages]"):
>> On 16.11.15 at 17:00, wrote:
>> > Based on this, which is the only regress
Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 63948: regressions
- FAIL [and 1 more messages] [and 1 more messages]"):
> On 16.11.15 at 17:00, wrote:
> > Based on this, which is the only regression in 64287, we could force
> > push this:
...
> Well, y
>>> On 16.11.15 at 17:00, wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 63948:
> regressions -
> FAIL [and 1 more messages]"):
>> I wonder how easy it would be to filter out the wrong advertisement,
>> during outgoing migration, in
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 63948: regressions
- FAIL [and 1 more messages]"):
> I wonder how easy it would be to filter out the wrong advertisement,
> during outgoing migration, in the toolstack in 4.2. I appreciate that
> 4.2 is long-dead.
Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 63948: regressions
- FAIL"):
> On 11.11.15 at 16:58, wrote:
> > Do we know why this cross-version migration test fails when
> > within-version migrations of both 4.2 and 4.3 succeed ?
>
> As said in
On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 15:58 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Also we don't know (ATM) whether 4.3->4.4 works. 4.4->4.5 does.
Are you basing that on
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/results/history/test-amd64-amd64-migrupgrade/xen-4.4-testing.html
and
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/os
>>> On 11.11.15 at 16:58, wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 63948:
> regressions -
> FAIL"):
>> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 63948:
>> regressions
> - FAIL"):
>> &g
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 63948: regressions
- FAIL"):
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 63948:
> regressions - FAIL"):
> > But given this is a new test case I would be happy, I think, to restrict it
&
On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 15:30 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 63948:
> regressions - FAIL"):
> > Aside from the above I don't think osstest is currently aware of the
> > vendor
> > of the processors (al
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 63948: regressions
- FAIL"):
> Aside from the above I don't think osstest is currently aware of the vendor
> of the processors (although I can certainly think of several reasons it
> should be).
osstest
On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 04:35 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 11.11.15 at 12:25, wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 03:58 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > > > On 10.11.15 at 18:59, wrote:
> > > > flight 63948 xen-4.3-testing real [real]
> > > > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/6
>>> On 11.11.15 at 12:25, wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 03:58 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> > > > On 10.11.15 at 18:59, wrote:
>> > flight 63948 xen-4.3-testing real [real]
>> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/63948/
>> >
>> > Regressions :-(
>> >
>> > Tests which did not succ
On Wed, 2015-11-11 at 03:58 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 10.11.15 at 18:59, wrote:
> > flight 63948 xen-4.3-testing real [real]
> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/63948/
> >
> > Regressions :-(
> >
> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > including tests w
>>> On 10.11.15 at 18:59, wrote:
> flight 63948 xen-4.3-testing real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/63948/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> test-amd64-amd64-migrupgrade 21 guest-migrate/
flight 63948 xen-4.3-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/63948/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-migrupgrade 21 guest-migrate/src_host/dst_host fail REGR. vs.
63212
Regression
16 matches
Mail list logo
