>>> On 16.11.15 at 17:14, <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
> Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.3-testing test] 63948:
> regressions -
> FAIL [and 1 more messages] [and 1 more messages]"):
>> On 16.11.15 at 17:00, <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
>> > Based on this, which is the only regression in 64287, we could force
>> > push this:
> ...
>> Well, yes, but wouldn't it re-occur once it managed to run on an
>> Intel box again?
>
> Yes, but that's not very likely to happen soon.
>
> This will allow us to think about the medium-term fix without the
> short-term breakage causing pain.
Okay. Why don't you go ahead then?
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
