Re: [Xen-devel] [rumpuserxen test] 33416: regressions - FAIL [and 1 more messages]

2015-01-16 Thread Antti Kantee
On 16/01/15 11:17, Ian Jackson wrote: The latter is the GPF turning out to be unreproducible. I guess we should keep an eye out in case it turns out to be a race rather than a cosmic ray. I do not believe in cosmic rays. Some notes in case it resurfaces: 1) the topmost caller address appears

Re: [Xen-devel] [rumpuserxen test] 33416: regressions - FAIL [and 1 more messages]

2015-01-16 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [rumpuserxen test] 33416: regressions - FAIL"): ... > I can't easily rerun it by hand, but the cron job is rerunning it > already. Also our automatic bisector is working on it. xen.org writes ("[rumpuserxen test] 33434: tolerable

Re: [Xen-devel] [rumpuserxen test] 33416: regressions - FAIL

2015-01-15 Thread Ian Jackson
Martin Lucina writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [rumpuserxen test] 33416: regressions - FAIL"): > ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com said: > > Looking at the output of `objdump -d .../rump-kernel' it's in > > __sflush, called by fflush. The alleged caller of fflush, `0x42f

Re: [Xen-devel] [rumpuserxen test] 33416: regressions - FAIL

2015-01-15 Thread Martin Lucina
mar...@lucina.net said: > > The build was this > > > > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/33416/build-amd64-rumpuserxen/info.html > > and the output files are here: > > > > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/33416/build-amd64-rumpuserxen/build/ > > of which the rel

Re: [Xen-devel] [rumpuserxen test] 33416: regressions - FAIL

2015-01-15 Thread Martin Lucina
ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com said: > Martin Lucina writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [rumpuserxen test] 33416: regressions > - FAIL"): > > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/33416/test-amd64-amd64-rumpuserxen-amd64/guest-rump-console > > Yes. > > > -

Re: [Xen-devel] [rumpuserxen test] 33416: regressions - FAIL

2015-01-15 Thread Ian Jackson
Martin Lucina writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [rumpuserxen test] 33416: regressions - FAIL"): > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/33416/test-amd64-amd64-rumpuserxen-amd64/guest-rump-console Yes. > --- > GPF rip: 0x6018b, error_code=0 ... > --- > > Ian,

Re: [Xen-devel] [rumpuserxen test] 33416: regressions - FAIL

2015-01-15 Thread Martin Lucina
ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com said: > flight 33416 rumpuserxen real [real] > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/33416/ > > Regressions :-( I presume this is the console log: http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/33416/test-amd64-amd64-rumpuserxen-amd64/guest-rump-console --

[Xen-devel] [rumpuserxen test] 33416: regressions - FAIL

2015-01-14 Thread xen . org
flight 33416 rumpuserxen real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/33416/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-rumpuserxen-amd64 8 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 33401 version targeted for