ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com said:
> Martin Lucina writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [rumpuserxen test] 33416: regressions
> - FAIL"):
> > http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/33416/test-amd64-amd64-rumpuserxen-amd64/guest-rump-console
>
> Yes.
>
> > ---
> > GPF rip: 0x6018b, error_code=0
> ...
> > ---
> >
> > Ian, do you have the build output (rump-kernel) around somewhere? Would be
> > useful to get a symbol table to see where 0x6018b lies.
>
> The build was this
>
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/33416/build-amd64-rumpuserxen/info.html
> and the output files are here:
>
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/33416/build-amd64-rumpuserxen/build/
> of which the relevant part is this:
>
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/33416/build-amd64-rumpuserxen/build/rumpuserxendist.tar.gz
> which contains
> usr/local/lib/xen/rump-kernel/rump-kernel
>
> Looking at the output of `objdump -d .../rump-kernel' it's in
> __sflush, called by fflush. The alleged caller of fflush, `0x42ff70',
> isn't in the text segment.
Ok, that makes no sense. Can you re-run the tests to see if it's
repeatable?
Martin
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
