Hi Ian,
On 02/11/15 10:17, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> So shall we disable 3.14 job for ARM for once and all?
>
> Given the above failure I don't think the ability to test the 3.14 kernels
> on the Cambridge instance is all that valuable. So yes, I think we should
> drop ARM from the linux-3.14 flight
On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 18:12 +, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 28/10/15 17:31, osstest service owner wrote:
> > flight 63336 linux-3.14 real [real]
> > http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/63336/
> >
> > Regressions :-(
> >
> > Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> > i
Hi,
On 28/10/15 17:31, osstest service owner wrote:
> flight 63336 linux-3.14 real [real]
> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/63336/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> build-armhf-pvops 5 k
flight 63336 linux-3.14 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/63336/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-armhf-pvops 5 kernel-build fail REGR. vs. 62648
Regressions which are
