On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 03.03.17 at 16:16, wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 8:22 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> int __init acpi_numa_init(void)
>>> {
>>> if (!acpi_parse_table()) {
>>> acpi_table_parse_srat(TYPE_CPU_AFFINITY);
>>
>> Thi
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 8:22 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
> On 03/03/17 14:45, Vijay Kilari wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 03/03/17 13:50, Vijay Kilari wrote:
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 7:14 PM, Julien Grall
wrote:
>>>
>>
>>> On 03.03.17 at 16:16, wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 8:22 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>> int __init acpi_numa_init(void)
>> {
>> if (!acpi_parse_table()) {
>> acpi_table_parse_srat(TYPE_CPU_AFFINITY);
>
> This is not defined for ARM. We have to make this also arch sp
On 03/03/17 14:45, Vijay Kilari wrote:
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
On 03/03/17 13:50, Vijay Kilari wrote:
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 7:14 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
This is quite disgusting. We should avoid any #ifdef CONFIG_{X86,ARM}
in
common header.
Also, x2apic an
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 7:22 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>
>
> On 03/03/17 13:50, Vijay Kilari wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 7:14 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
>
> This is quite disgusting. We should avoid any #ifdef CONFIG_{X86,ARM}
> in
> common header.
>
> Also, x2apic and g
On 03/03/17 13:50, Vijay Kilari wrote:
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 7:14 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
This is quite disgusting. We should avoid any #ifdef CONFIG_{X86,ARM} in
common header.
Also, x2apic and gicc are respectively x86-specific and arm-specific. So
I
think we should move the parsing in a
On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 7:14 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hello Vijay,
>
> On 03/03/17 12:39, Vijay Kilari wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 10:51 PM, Julien Grall
>> wrote:
diff --git a/xen/drivers/acpi/numa.c b/xen/drivers/acpi/numa.c
index 50bf9f8..ce22e88 100644
--- a/xen/dr
Hello Vijay,
On 03/03/17 12:39, Vijay Kilari wrote:
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 10:51 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
diff --git a/xen/drivers/acpi/numa.c b/xen/drivers/acpi/numa.c
index 50bf9f8..ce22e88 100644
--- a/xen/drivers/acpi/numa.c
+++ b/xen/drivers/acpi/numa.c
@@ -25,9 +25,11 @@
#include
#incl
On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 10:51 PM, Julien Grall wrote:
> (+ Jan as ACPI maintainer)
>
> Hello Vijay,
>
> On 09/02/17 15:57, vijay.kil...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> From: Vijaya Kumar K
>>
>> Register SRAT entry handler for type
>> ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_GICC_AFFINITY to parse SRAT table
>> and extract proximit
(+ Jan as ACPI maintainer)
Hello Vijay,
On 09/02/17 15:57, vijay.kil...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Vijaya Kumar K
Register SRAT entry handler for type
ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_GICC_AFFINITY to parse SRAT table
and extract proximity for all CPU IDs.
Signed-off-by: Vijaya Kumar
---
xen/arch/arm/acpi_numa.
From: Vijaya Kumar K
Register SRAT entry handler for type
ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_GICC_AFFINITY to parse SRAT table
and extract proximity for all CPU IDs.
Signed-off-by: Vijaya Kumar
---
xen/arch/arm/acpi_numa.c | 55 +++
xen/drivers/acpi/numa.c | 37 +
11 matches
Mail list logo
