On 31/03/15 14:22, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 14:07 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hi Ian,
>>
>> On 31/03/15 12:57, Ian Campbell wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 19:29 +, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>
>>> I think there is a healthy chunk at the start which is all acked and
>>> could b
On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 14:07 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> On 31/03/15 12:57, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 19:29 +, Julien Grall wrote:
> >
> > I think there is a healthy chunk at the start which is all acked and
> > could be applied, could you let me know how far t
Hi Ian,
On 31/03/15 12:57, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 19:29 +, Julien Grall wrote:
>
> I think there is a healthy chunk at the start which is all acked and
> could be applied, could you let me know how far through the acked bit of
> the series you think it would be sensible t
On Thu, 2015-03-19 at 19:29 +, Julien Grall wrote:
I think there is a healthy chunk at the start which is all acked and
could be applied, could you let me know how far through the acked bit of
the series you think it would be sensible to apply now?
If there are any acked bits which follow una
On 20/03/2015 01:22, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
Hi Julien,
Hello Edgar,
The partial device-tree support is nice and very flexible. I couldn't help
thinking that it would be nice to be able to describe more of the
guest with device-trees. It may be controversial but it would be cool
to be able t
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 07:29:26PM +, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> This is the fourth version of this patch series to add support for platform
> device passthrough on ARM.
>
> In order to passthrough a non-PCI device, the user will have to:
> - Map manually MMIO/IRQ
> - Descri
Hello all,
This is the fourth version of this patch series to add support for platform
device passthrough on ARM.
In order to passthrough a non-PCI device, the user will have to:
- Map manually MMIO/IRQ
- Describe the device in the newly partial device tree support
- Specify the list
