On 05/12/2015 03:06 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> In fact, printing the cpupool's CPU online mask
> for each vCPU is just redundant, as that is the
> same for all the vCPUs of all the domains in the
> same cpupool, while hard affinity is already part
> of the output of dumping domains info.
>
> Inst
>
>> 2015-05-12 10:06 GMT-04:00 Dario Faggioli :
>
>> > --- a/xen/common/sched_rt.c
>> > +++ b/xen/common/sched_rt.c
>> > @@ -124,6 +124,24 @@
>> > #define TRC_RTDS_BUDGET_REPLENISH TRC_SCHED_CLASS_EVT(RTDS, 4)
>> > #define TRC_RTDS_SCHED_TASKLETTRC_SCHED_CLASS_EVT(RTDS, 5)
>> >
>> > + /*
>>
On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 12:01 -0400, Meng Xu wrote:
> Hi Dario,
>
Hi,
> 2015-05-12 10:06 GMT-04:00 Dario Faggioli :
> > --- a/xen/common/sched_rt.c
> > +++ b/xen/common/sched_rt.c
> > @@ -124,6 +124,24 @@
> > #define TRC_RTDS_BUDGET_REPLENISH TRC_SCHED_CLASS_EVT(RTDS, 4)
> > #define TRC_RTDS_SCH
Hi Dario,
2015-05-12 10:06 GMT-04:00 Dario Faggioli :
> In fact, printing the cpupool's CPU online mask
> for each vCPU is just redundant, as that is the
> same for all the vCPUs of all the domains in the
> same cpupool, while hard affinity is already part
> of the output of dumping domains info.
In fact, printing the cpupool's CPU online mask
for each vCPU is just redundant, as that is the
same for all the vCPUs of all the domains in the
same cpupool, while hard affinity is already part
of the output of dumping domains info.
Instead, print the intersection between hard
affinity and online
