On 05/12/2015 03:06 PM, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> In fact, printing the cpupool's CPU online mask
> for each vCPU is just redundant, as that is the
> same for all the vCPUs of all the domains in the
> same cpupool, while hard affinity is already part
> of the output of dumping domains info.
>
> Instead, print the intersection between hard
> affinity and online CPUs, which is --in case of this
> scheduler-- the effective affinity always used for
> the vCPUs.
>
> This change also takes the chance to add a scratch
> cpumask area, to avoid having to either put one
> (more) cpumask_t on the stack, or dynamically
> allocate it within the dumping routine. (The former
> being bad because hypervisor stack size is limited,
> the latter because dynamic allocations can fail, if
> the hypervisor was built for a large enough number
> of CPUs.) We allocate such scratch area, for all pCPUs,
> when the first instance of the RTDS scheduler is
> activated and, in order not to loose track/leak it
> if other instances are activated in new cpupools,
> and when the last instance is deactivated, we (sort
> of) refcount it.
>
> Such scratch area can be used to kill most of the
> cpumasks{_var}_t local variables in other functions
> in the file, but that is *NOT* done in this chage.
>
> Finally, convert the file to use keyhandler scratch,
> instead of open coded string buffers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggi...@citrix.com>
> Cc: George Dunlap <george.dun...@eu.citrix.com>
> Cc: Meng Xu <xumengpa...@gmail.com>
> Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
> Cc: Keir Fraser <k...@xen.org>
I haven't reviewed this, but since I gave a reviewed-by for the previous
series, and its' been reviewed by Meng:
Acked-by: George Dunlap <george.dun...@eu.citrix.com>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
