On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 06:32 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > > > On 11.02.16 at 14:21, wrote:
> > On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 12:31 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> > > On 11/02/16 12:23, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > > > From: Doug Goldstein
> > > >
> > > > To help people avoid having to figure out what versions
>>> On 11.02.16 at 14:21, wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 12:31 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 11/02/16 12:23, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> > From: Doug Goldstein
>> >
>> > To help people avoid having to figure out what versions of gcc and
>> > binutils need to be supported document them explicitly.
On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 12:31 +, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 11/02/16 12:23, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > From: Doug Goldstein
> >
> > To help people avoid having to figure out what versions of gcc and
> > binutils need to be supported document them explicitly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Doug Goldstein
On 11/02/16 12:23, Ian Campbell wrote:
> From: Doug Goldstein
>
> To help people avoid having to figure out what versions of gcc and
> binutils need to be supported document them explicitly.
>
> Signed-off-by: Doug Goldstein
> Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell
I would be tempted to abbreviate this to
From: Doug Goldstein
To help people avoid having to figure out what versions of gcc and
binutils need to be supported document them explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Doug Goldstein
Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell
---
v3: [ijc] Updated version for binutils and include gcc (separately for
x86 and ARM in bo
