On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 06:32 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > On 11.02.16 at 14:21, <ian.campb...@citrix.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 12:31 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: > > > On 11/02/16 12:23, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > > From: Doug Goldstein <car...@cardoe.com> > > > > > > > > To help people avoid having to figure out what versions of gcc and > > > > binutils need to be supported document them explicitly. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Doug Goldstein <car...@cardoe.com> > > > > Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com> > > > > > > I would be tempted to abbreviate this to GCC 4.1 and Binutls 2.16, > > > unless we specifically know of issues between the release and point > > > releases. > > > > I don't mind doing this but if there is any quibbling at all about it > > then > > I would simply go with what is below. > > Yeah, I'd prefer the patches to go in as they're now: Both > Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
I have applied them both with you ack and Andy's R-by since he said "Either way". Thanks everyone. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
