On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 2:03 AM, Ian Campbell
wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-02-14 at 22:32 -0800, Suriyan Ramasami wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Ian Campbell <
> > ian.campb...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 17:47 -0800, Suriyan Ramasami wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
On Sun, 2016-02-14 at 22:32 -0800, Suriyan Ramasami wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Ian Campbell <
> ian.campb...@citrix.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 17:47 -0800, Suriyan Ramasami wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:03 AM, Ian Campbell <
> > ian.campb...@citr
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 1:40 AM, Ian Campbell
wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 17:47 -0800, Suriyan Ramasami wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:03 AM, Ian Campbell
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 10:20 -0800, Suriyan Ramasami wrote:
> > > > I agree on the first two paragraphs.
>
On Wed, 2016-02-10 at 17:47 -0800, Suriyan Ramasami wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:03 AM, Ian Campbell
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 10:20 -0800, Suriyan Ramasami wrote:
> > > I agree on the first two paragraphs.
> > > > > For the third paragraph, the rebuttal is that the exynos580
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:03 AM, Ian Campbell
wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 10:20 -0800, Suriyan Ramasami wrote:
> > I agree on the first two paragraphs.
> > > > For the third paragraph, the rebuttal is that the exynos5800 and
> > > > exynos5422 based SoCs can have both clusters on at the same
On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 10:20 -0800, Suriyan Ramasami wrote:
> I agree on the first two paragraphs.
> > > For the third paragraph, the rebuttal is that the exynos5800 and
> > > exynos5422 based SoCs can have both clusters on at the same time. Hence,
> > > the third paragrapah comment will have to be
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 6:19 AM, Ian Campbell
wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 04:50 -0800, Suriyan Ramasami wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Ian Campbell
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 21:48 -0800, Suriyan Ramasami wrote:
> > > > The Odroid-XU3/XU4 from hardkernel is an E
On Tue, 2016-02-09 at 04:50 -0800, Suriyan Ramasami wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Ian Campbell
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 21:48 -0800, Suriyan Ramasami wrote:
> > > The Odroid-XU3/XU4 from hardkernel is an Exynos 5422 based board.
> > > Code from mcpm-exynos.c and mcpm-pla
On Tue, Feb 9, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Ian Campbell
wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 21:48 -0800, Suriyan Ramasami wrote:
> > The Odroid-XU3/XU4 from hardkernel is an Exynos 5422 based board.
> > Code from mcpm-exynos.c and mcpm-platsmp.c from the Linux kernel
> > has been used to get all the 8 cores from
On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 21:48 -0800, Suriyan Ramasami wrote:
> The Odroid-XU3/XU4 from hardkernel is an Exynos 5422 based board.
> Code from mcpm-exynos.c and mcpm-platsmp.c from the Linux kernel
> has been used to get all the 8 cores from the 2 clusters powered
> on.
> The Linux DTS for these odroid
The Odroid-XU3/XU4 from hardkernel is an Exynos 5422 based board.
Code from mcpm-exynos.c and mcpm-platsmp.c from the Linux kernel
has been used to get all the 8 cores from the 2 clusters powered
on.
The Linux DTS for these odroid uses "samsung,exynos5800" as
the machine compatible string. Hence, t
11 matches
Mail list logo
