>>> On 05.07.15 at 19:39, wrote:
> On 05/07/2015 13:59, Parth Dixit wrote:
>> +shannon
>
> I've just received ~50 mails "+shannon". Couldn't you have forward all
> the email privately rather replying to every single mail and cc shannon?
Seconded. Considering this I simply deleted all the mails
On 5 July 2015 at 23:09, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05/07/2015 13:59, Parth Dixit wrote:
>>
>> +shannon
>
>
> I've just received ~50 mails "+shannon". Couldn't you have forward all the
> email privately rather replying to every single mail and cc shannon?
I thought about FWD'ing initially bu
Hi,
On 05/07/2015 13:59, Parth Dixit wrote:
+shannon
I've just received ~50 mails "+shannon". Couldn't you have forward all
the email privately rather replying to every single mail and cc shannon?
Archives also exists for Xen devel, and it's even possible to download
them in order to answ
+shannon
On 20 May 2015 at 22:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 20.05.15 at 17:49, wrote:
>> What about defining a new define HAVE_NUMA?
>
> That might be an acceptable compromise.
>
> Jan
>
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists
>>> On 20.05.15 at 17:49, wrote:
> What about defining a new define HAVE_NUMA?
That might be an acceptable compromise.
Jan
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
On 20/05/15 16:41, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 20.05.15 at 17:21, wrote:
>> On 20/05/15 16:07, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 17.05.15 at 22:03, wrote:
From: Naresh Bhat
Numa is currently not supported for arm in xen.
>>>
>>> This doesn't represent a valid reason for the code to be d
>>> On 20.05.15 at 17:21, wrote:
> On 20/05/15 16:07, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 17.05.15 at 22:03, wrote:
>>> From: Naresh Bhat
>>>
>>> Numa is currently not supported for arm in xen.
>>
>> This doesn't represent a valid reason for the code to be disabled,
>> the more that ARM will want to su
On 20/05/15 16:07, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.05.15 at 22:03, wrote:
>> From: Naresh Bhat
>>
>> Numa is currently not supported for arm in xen.
>
> This doesn't represent a valid reason for the code to be disabled,
> the more that ARM will want to support NUMA sooner or later. A
> valid reaso
>>> On 17.05.15 at 22:03, wrote:
> From: Naresh Bhat
>
> Numa is currently not supported for arm in xen.
This doesn't represent a valid reason for the code to be disabled,
the more that ARM will want to support NUMA sooner or later. A
valid reason would be if you'd have to introduce _a lot_ of
Hi Parth,
On 17/05/15 21:03, Parth Dixit wrote:
> From: Naresh Bhat
>
> Numa is currently not supported for arm in xen.
> Configure and build numa for x86 architecture only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naresh Bhat
> Signed-off-by: Parth Dixit
Reviewed-by: Julien Grall
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
___
From: Naresh Bhat
Numa is currently not supported for arm in xen.
Configure and build numa for x86 architecture only.
Signed-off-by: Naresh Bhat
Signed-off-by: Parth Dixit
---
xen/drivers/acpi/Makefile | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/xen/drivers/acpi/Makefi
11 matches
Mail list logo
