On Tue, 2015-11-03 at 17:08 +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 16:51 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 05:43:51PM +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > > In fact, right now, failing at destroying a cpupool is just
> > > not reported to the user in any explicit way.
> > >
On Wed, 2015-10-28 at 16:51 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 05:43:51PM +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> > In fact, right now, failing at destroying a cpupool is just
> > not reported to the user in any explicit way.
> >
> > Let's log an error, as it is customary for xl in these cases
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 05:43:51PM +0100, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> In fact, right now, failing at destroying a cpupool is just
> not reported to the user in any explicit way.
>
> Let's log an error, as it is customary for xl in these cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli
> Reviewed-by: Juergen
In fact, right now, failing at destroying a cpupool is just
not reported to the user in any explicit way.
Let's log an error, as it is customary for xl in these cases.
Signed-off-by: Dario Faggioli
Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross
---
Cc: Ian Jackson
Cc: Stefano Stabellini
Cc: Ian Campbell
Cc: Wei
