On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 01:19:24AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 09.12.16 at 00:08, wrote:
[...]
> > I have checked it. It requires at least some changes made by patch #1 which
> > has "Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich ". Of course I can change
> > this but then I think that I should drop your Revi
>>> On 09.12.16 at 00:08, wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 06:27:58PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 06:43:40AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> > >>> On 05.12.16 at 23:25, wrote:
>> > > Current early command line parser implementation in assembler
>> > > is very difficult to c
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 06:27:58PM +0100, Daniel Kiper wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 06:43:40AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > >>> On 05.12.16 at 23:25, wrote:
> > > Current early command line parser implementation in assembler
> > > is very difficult to change to relocatable stuff using segment
On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 06:43:40AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 05.12.16 at 23:25, wrote:
> > Current early command line parser implementation in assembler
> > is very difficult to change to relocatable stuff using segment
> > registers. This requires a lot of changes in very weird and
> > f
>>> On 05.12.16 at 23:25, wrote:
> Current early command line parser implementation in assembler
> is very difficult to change to relocatable stuff using segment
> registers. This requires a lot of changes in very weird and
> fragile code. So, reimplement this functionality in C. This
> way code w
Current early command line parser implementation in assembler
is very difficult to change to relocatable stuff using segment
registers. This requires a lot of changes in very weird and
fragile code. So, reimplement this functionality in C. This
way code will be relocatable out of the box (without p
