On 07/10/2015 03:41 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 08.07.15 at 12:22, wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
>> @@ -653,6 +653,31 @@ static int hvmemul_read(
>> unsigned int bytes,
>> struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
>> {
>> +struct hvm_emulate_
>>> On 08.07.15 at 12:22, wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
> @@ -653,6 +653,31 @@ static int hvmemul_read(
> unsigned int bytes,
> struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt)
> {
> +struct hvm_emulate_ctxt *hvmemul_ctxt =
> +container_of(ctxt,
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 6:22 AM, Razvan Cojocaru
wrote:
> This patch adds support for memory-content hiding, by modifying the
> value returned by emulated instructions that read certain memory
> addresses that contain sensitive data. The patch only applies to
> cases where MEM_ACCESS_EMULATE or ME
This patch adds support for memory-content hiding, by modifying the
value returned by emulated instructions that read certain memory
addresses that contain sensitive data. The patch only applies to
cases where MEM_ACCESS_EMULATE or MEM_ACCESS_EMULATE_NOWRITE have
been set to a vm_event response.
S
