Rob Hoes writes ("[PATCH RFC 0/9] libxl error reporting"):
>
> Following the proposal from Euan Harris to improve libxl's error
> reporting [1], I have written a first couple of patches that I would
> like some feedback on. The focus of these patches is on improving
> the errors that can be raise
Following the proposal from Euan Harris to improve libxl's error reporting [1],
I have written a first couple of patches that I would like some feedback on.
The focus of these patches is on improving the errors that can be raised by the
device_add functions and some related ones.
Does the approac
