On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 01:36:13PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 31/08/17 13:03, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 31.08.17 at 13:45, wrote:
> >> There is only one function gate_op_read that needs to be modified.
> > I'm fine with it just being read() here, but I can see this being possibly
> > cont
On 31/08/17 13:03, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 31.08.17 at 13:45, wrote:
>> There is only one function gate_op_read that needs to be modified.
> I'm fine with it just being read() here, but I can see this being possibly
> controversial. Please double check that Andrew isn't entirely opposed
> to it
>>> On 31.08.17 at 13:45, wrote:
> There is only one function gate_op_read that needs to be modified.
I'm fine with it just being read() here, but I can see this being possibly
controversial. Please double check that Andrew isn't entirely opposed
to it. An alternative suggestion would then be rea
There is only one function gate_op_read that needs to be modified.
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu
---
xen/arch/x86/pv/emul-gate-op.c | 15 +--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/pv/emul-gate-op.c b/xen/arch/x86/pv/emul-gate-op.c
index 0a7381a094..002f
