On 31/08/17 13:03, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 31.08.17 at 13:45, <wei.l...@citrix.com> wrote: >> There is only one function gate_op_read that needs to be modified. > I'm fine with it just being read() here, but I can see this being possibly > controversial. Please double check that Andrew isn't entirely opposed > to it. An alternative suggestion would then be read_mem().
I'm not opposed generally, but simply 'read' has a chance of angering Coverity, because it has inbuilt models for most functions specified by core standards like POSIX. read_mem() would be better. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
