On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 6:45 PM, Andrew Cooper
wrote:
> On 25/08/17 17:43, George Dunlap wrote:
>> Rather than open-coding the "read" from the input file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: George Dunlap
>
> This patch fills me with dread.
>
> How about data_read() and data_available() which are slightly more
On Fri, Aug 25, 2017 at 6:45 PM, Andrew Cooper
wrote:
> On 25/08/17 17:43, George Dunlap wrote:
>> Rather than open-coding the "read" from the input file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: George Dunlap
>
> This patch fills me with dread.
>
> How about data_read() and data_available() which are slightly more
On 25/08/17 17:43, George Dunlap wrote:
> Rather than open-coding the "read" from the input file.
>
> Signed-off-by: George Dunlap
This patch fills me with dread.
How about data_read() and data_available() which are slightly more
descriptive?
Also, both should be using bool rather than int.
~A
Rather than open-coding the "read" from the input file.
Signed-off-by: George Dunlap
---
CC: Ian Jackson
CC: Wei Liu
CC: Andrew Cooper
CC: Jan Beulich
---
tools/fuzz/x86_instruction_emulator/fuzz-emul.c | 31 ++---
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --
