On Wed, Nov 04, 2015 at 11:23:29AM +, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 11:15 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> > In 5b725e56 (xl: improve return and exit codes of vcpu related
> > functions), the return value of libxl_cpu_bitmap_alloc was not stored in
> > rc anymore. Yet the subsequent fprint
On Wed, 2015-11-04 at 11:15 +, Wei Liu wrote:
> In 5b725e56 (xl: improve return and exit codes of vcpu related
> functions), the return value of libxl_cpu_bitmap_alloc was not stored in
> rc anymore. Yet the subsequent fprintf still used that.
>
> While it is trivial to reinstate the original
In 5b725e56 (xl: improve return and exit codes of vcpu related
functions), the return value of libxl_cpu_bitmap_alloc was not stored in
rc anymore. Yet the subsequent fprintf still used that.
While it is trivial to reinstate the original implementation, xl's
caller has no idea what a libxl error c
