In 5b725e56 (xl: improve return and exit codes of vcpu related
functions), the return value of libxl_cpu_bitmap_alloc was not stored in
rc anymore. Yet the subsequent fprintf still used that.
While it is trivial to reinstate the original implementation, xl's
caller has no idea what a libxl error code is so printing out rc won't
be that useful. Don't print out rc in that case.
Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>
---
Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com>
Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggi...@citrix.com>
Cc: Harmandeep Kaur <write.harmand...@gmail.com>
---
tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c b/tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c
index 2756d2f..6056344 100644
--- a/tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c
+++ b/tools/libxl/xl_cmdimpl.c
@@ -5474,7 +5474,7 @@ static int vcpuset(uint32_t domid, const char* nr_vcpus,
int check_host)
return 1;
}
if (libxl_cpu_bitmap_alloc(ctx, &cpumap, max_vcpus)) {
- fprintf(stderr, "libxl_cpu_bitmap_alloc failed, rc: %d\n", rc);
+ fprintf(stderr, "libxl_cpu_bitmap_alloc failed\n");
return 1;
}
for (i = 0; i < max_vcpus; i++)
--
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
