On 12/18/2015 10:19 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 18.12.15 at 16:12, wrote:
On 12/18/2015 01:21 AM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Boris Ostrovsky [mailto:boris.ostrov...@oracle.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 10:42 PM
On 12/17/2015 09:29 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.12.15 at 15:26, wrote:
On
>>> On 18.12.15 at 16:12, wrote:
> On 12/18/2015 01:21 AM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>>> From: Boris Ostrovsky [mailto:boris.ostrov...@oracle.com]
>>> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 10:42 PM
>>>
>>> On 12/17/2015 09:29 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 17.12.15 at 15:26, wrote:
> On 12/17/2015 09
On 12/18/2015 01:21 AM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Boris Ostrovsky [mailto:boris.ostrov...@oracle.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 10:42 PM
On 12/17/2015 09:29 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.12.15 at 15:26, wrote:
On 12/17/2015 09:18 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.12.15 at 15:12, wrote:
On
> From: Boris Ostrovsky [mailto:boris.ostrov...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2015 10:42 PM
>
> On 12/17/2015 09:29 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 17.12.15 at 15:26, wrote:
> >> On 12/17/2015 09:18 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 17.12.15 at 15:12, wrote:
> On 12/17/2015 0
On 12/17/2015 09:29 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.12.15 at 15:26, wrote:
On 12/17/2015 09:18 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.12.15 at 15:12, wrote:
On 12/17/2015 09:01 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
@@ -415,8 +416,10 @@ static int core2_vpmu_verify(struct vcpu
enabled_cntrs |= (1ULL <<
>>> On 17.12.15 at 15:26, wrote:
> On 12/17/2015 09:18 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 17.12.15 at 15:12, wrote:
>>> On 12/17/2015 09:01 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
@@ -415,8 +416,10 @@ static int core2_vpmu_verify(struct vcpu
enabled_cntrs |= (1ULL << i);
}
On 12/17/2015 09:18 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 17.12.15 at 15:12, wrote:
On 12/17/2015 09:01 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
@@ -415,8 +416,10 @@ static int core2_vpmu_verify(struct vcpu
enabled_cntrs |= (1ULL << i);
}
-if ( vpmu_is_set(vcpu_vpmu(v), VPMU_CPU_HAS_DS) &&
-
>>> On 17.12.15 at 15:12, wrote:
> On 12/17/2015 09:01 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> @@ -415,8 +416,10 @@ static int core2_vpmu_verify(struct vcpu
>> enabled_cntrs |= (1ULL << i);
>> }
>>
>> -if ( vpmu_is_set(vcpu_vpmu(v), VPMU_CPU_HAS_DS) &&
>> - !is_canonical_addre
On 12/17/2015 09:01 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
For one, loading the MSR with a possibly non-canonical address was
possible since the verification is conditional, while the MSR load
wasn't. And then for PV guests we need to further limit the range of
valid addresses to exclude the hypervisor range.
S
On 17/12/15 14:01, Jan Beulich wrote:
> For one, loading the MSR with a possibly non-canonical address was
> possible since the verification is conditional, while the MSR load
> wasn't. And then for PV guests we need to further limit the range of
> valid addresses to exclude the hypervisor range.
>
For one, loading the MSR with a possibly non-canonical address was
possible since the verification is conditional, while the MSR load
wasn't. And then for PV guests we need to further limit the range of
valid addresses to exclude the hypervisor range.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich
--- a/xen/arch/x8
11 matches
Mail list logo
