>>> On 17.12.15 at 15:12, <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com> wrote: > On 12/17/2015 09:01 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >> @@ -415,8 +416,10 @@ static int core2_vpmu_verify(struct vcpu >> enabled_cntrs |= (1ULL << i); >> } >> >> - if ( vpmu_is_set(vcpu_vpmu(v), VPMU_CPU_HAS_DS) && >> - !is_canonical_address(core2_vpmu_cxt->ds_area) ) >> + if ( vpmu_is_set(vpmu, VPMU_CPU_HAS_DS) && >> + !(has_hvm_container_vcpu(v) >> + ? is_canonical_address(core2_vpmu_cxt->ds_area) >> + : __addr_ok(core2_vpmu_cxt->ds_area)) ) > > Should we instead of (or in addition to) this also make the same change > in core2_vpmu_do_wrmsr()?
Currently there's no need for this since - afaict - PV guests can't write this MSR directly (it's not among the white listed set in traps.c). Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
