On 06/26/2015 11:56 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 26.06.15 at 17:50, wrote:
On 06/26/2015 11:42 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 26.06.15 at 16:58, wrote:
On 06/26/2015 05:02 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
-uint64_t nsvm_vcpu_guestcr3(struct vcpu *v)
-{
-return vcpu_nestedsvm(v).ns_vmcb_guestcr3;
-}
>>> On 26.06.15 at 17:50, wrote:
> On 06/26/2015 11:42 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 26.06.15 at 16:58, wrote:
>>> On 06/26/2015 05:02 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
-uint64_t nsvm_vcpu_guestcr3(struct vcpu *v)
-{
-return vcpu_nestedsvm(v).ns_vmcb_guestcr3;
-}
-
>>
On 06/26/2015 11:42 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 26.06.15 at 16:58, wrote:
On 06/26/2015 05:02 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
-uint64_t nsvm_vcpu_guestcr3(struct vcpu *v)
-{
-return vcpu_nestedsvm(v).ns_vmcb_guestcr3;
-}
-
If this is removed then I don't see why we still need ns_vmcb_guestcr3,
I
>>> On 26.06.15 at 16:58, wrote:
> On 06/26/2015 05:02 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>> -uint64_t nsvm_vcpu_guestcr3(struct vcpu *v)
>> -{
>> -return vcpu_nestedsvm(v).ns_vmcb_guestcr3;
>> -}
>> -
>
> If this is removed then I don't see why we still need ns_vmcb_guestcr3,
> I don't see it bei
On 06/26/2015 05:02 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
-uint64_t nsvm_vcpu_guestcr3(struct vcpu *v)
-{
-return vcpu_nestedsvm(v).ns_vmcb_guestcr3;
-}
-
If this is removed then I don't see why we still need ns_vmcb_guestcr3,
I don't see it being used anywhere except for being assigned a value.
-bo
On 26/06/15 10:02, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Some of the generic hooks were unused altogether - drop them.
>
> Some of the hooks were used only to handle calls from the specific
> vendor's code (SVM) - drop them too.
>
> Several more hooks were pointlessly implementaed as out-of-line
> functions, when m
Some of the generic hooks were unused altogether - drop them.
Some of the hooks were used only to handle calls from the specific
vendor's code (SVM) - drop them too.
Several more hooks were pointlessly implementaed as out-of-line
functions, when most (all?) other HVM hooks use inline ones - make
