On 06/26/2015 11:56 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 26.06.15 at 17:50, <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com> wrote:
On 06/26/2015 11:42 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 26.06.15 at 16:58, <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com> wrote:
On 06/26/2015 05:02 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
-uint64_t nsvm_vcpu_guestcr3(struct vcpu *v)
-{
- return vcpu_nestedsvm(v).ns_vmcb_guestcr3;
-}
-
If this is removed then I don't see why we still need ns_vmcb_guestcr3,
I don't see it being used anywhere except for being assigned a value.
I think in this patch I shouldn't remove any structure fields.
Perhaps a follow-up patch by one of the SVM maintainers?
OK.
Is this a shorthand for an ack then?
I was actually responding to your follow-up patch request.
But for SVM bits
Acked-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrov...@oracle.com>
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
